okay seriously, what are you insinuating, this seems like nothing input unless you come out and say what you're saying. you're contributing nothing to the conversation by just saying "these are the wrong words"
Okay i meant verb–I was kind of high. I don't believe I said it was wrong.
Checking now–I said 'fine', and stand by that. If you want to delve into intended meanings with me–I meant in the sense of 'she's a mighty fine ship' or 'he got a fiiiiine ass'. I don't think it matters. Even the sense of 'barely adequate39 or 'good enough but imperfect'–which is a totally sane reading of my original comment–wouldn't warrant that kind of response.
Why are you trying to incite conflict? What's your problem? Do you have some kind of problem with me–do you just lash out at everything you don't immediately understand?
okay. i guess i msiunderstood your original comment. it seemed like you were saying it wasn't good enough. i just wanted to engage in a conversation about how to say it better because i thought the top level propaganda seemed like the best i could think of and if we can do better we should do better. so i asked you what would be better and you said "lots of stuff" which seemed like intentionally dodging the question without doing anything constructive to me, which made the overall conversation seem combative. at that point i got annoyed and said "just come out an. say them then"
so this is all rooted in me misunderstanding your original intent, i guess. it came across to me as the opposite of what you're saying now
I think the original is pretty hard to misread in that way. I think you're internet poisoned by enough hazbarite genocider bullshit that you need to touch grass.
I recommend a mid grade sativa, your favorite music, and the company of a cat. Possibly like 4g of mushrooms.
This is why countries like Morocco have participated in the past, and why Israel participates now.
I believe it is also why Australia gets to participate as a guest each year.
22 Comments
Sunshine@piefed.ca · 48 pts · 324d
Eject Israel!
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 324d
Ejectrael?
Isragone?
Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 323d
Isabreal.
Siegfried@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 323d
Isnotreal
hector@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 323d
Best
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus · -1 pts · 324d
Thats a fine adjective, but we can do better.
itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 pts · 324d
(eject) (israel)
(verb) (noun)
Quill7513@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 323d
what verb would you suggest?
floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 322d
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus · -2 pts · 323d
So many good options, how to choose?
Quill7513@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 323d
okay seriously, what are you insinuating, this seems like nothing input unless you come out and say what you're saying. you're contributing nothing to the conversation by just saying "these are the wrong words"
floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 322d
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus · -2 pts · 323d
Okay i meant verb–I was kind of high. I don't believe I said it was wrong.
Checking now–I said 'fine', and stand by that. If you want to delve into intended meanings with me–I meant in the sense of 'she's a mighty fine ship' or 'he got a fiiiiine ass'. I don't think it matters. Even the sense of 'barely adequate39 or 'good enough but imperfect'–which is a totally sane reading of my original comment–wouldn't warrant that kind of response.
Why are you trying to incite conflict? What's your problem? Do you have some kind of problem with me–do you just lash out at everything you don't immediately understand?
Quill7513@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 323d
okay. i guess i msiunderstood your original comment. it seemed like you were saying it wasn't good enough. i just wanted to engage in a conversation about how to say it better because i thought the top level propaganda seemed like the best i could think of and if we can do better we should do better. so i asked you what would be better and you said "lots of stuff" which seemed like intentionally dodging the question without doing anything constructive to me, which made the overall conversation seem combative. at that point i got annoyed and said "just come out an. say them then"
so this is all rooted in me misunderstanding your original intent, i guess. it came across to me as the opposite of what you're saying now
floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 322d
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus · -1 pts · 323d
I think the original is pretty hard to misread in that way. I think you're internet poisoned by enough hazbarite genocider bullshit that you need to touch grass.
I recommend a mid grade sativa, your favorite music, and the company of a cat. Possibly like 4g of mushrooms.
axexrx@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 324d
How many is this now?
FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 324d
Five. "Spain is the fifth country to make pledge after Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Iceland" Source: https://www.irishtimes.com/media/2025/09/16/spain-to-quit-2026-eurovision-song-contest-if-israel-participates/
Edit: Which makes it six now that Poland is on board.
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
Two for sure, potentially 3.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 324d
Isreal isn’t even in Europe
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 324d
But it IS a European creation and a very important and lucrative colonial project!
Humanius@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 323d
Being in Europe is not a prerequisite for participating in Eurovision.
The only requirement is that a coutry's public broadcaster is a member of the European Broadcast Union.
Denoted in dark blue on the map below (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Broadcasting_Union)
This is why countries like Morocco have participated in the past, and why Israel participates now.
I believe it is also why Australia gets to participate as a guest each year.
Stamau123@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 323d
Replace Israel, bring back Morocco
xc2215x@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 324d
Good decision from the minister.
bigmamoth@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 323d
Incoming daesh attack