Hilarious that a big name website would implement minimum image sizes, but a very valid use case then. Cause nothing is more frustrating than having your upload being rejected for some arbitrary size limitation that doesn't match between sites
Technically? I work on document viewers and there are times I need to inspect rendering times for "large files." Being able to produce files of arbitrary size is beneficial for troubleshooting, but falls short of actual customer docs.
7 Comments
swicano@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 346d
But why?
sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 346d
Article states some websites like LinkedIn, government websites have a minimum requirement on image size. Say 50kb for linkedin pfp
swicano@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 345d
Hilarious that a big name website would implement minimum image sizes, but a very valid use case then. Cause nothing is more frustrating than having your upload being rejected for some arbitrary size limitation that doesn't match between sites
unmagical@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 346d
Charitably? Upscale a thumbnail.
Practically? Almost no reason.
Technically? I work on document viewers and there are times I need to inspect rendering times for "large files." Being able to produce files of arbitrary size is beneficial for troubleshooting, but falls short of actual customer docs.
Flaqueman@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 346d
Website suggests HadBomb... Not sure what that is
dumbass@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 346d
So you can do dumb shit like make a tiny 100mb file
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 345d
You could add the bee movie script as a metadata comment, or something. Although maybe there's a size limit on those.