How about one of those sliders where you reveal the original image and it can be half and half? Make it a capital crime not to do it. Auto-levels with no original? Straight to jail.
if the law applied exactly as the person above you described, it would be utterly useless, because every single photo you'll see online would be marked as manipulated. people don't post raw sensor data, online platforms don't accept raw sensor data, in many cases it's difficult to even get the data raw and not as a jpeg
So a new line in the GDPR popup indicating all chat on this site is "AI" (llm?) Driven.. For you to close along with the chat window so youn can just read the product page.
14 Comments
venusaur@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 333d
That’s fantastic. We need to follow France’s lead and require disclosure of pictures that have used filters.
klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe · 8 pts · 333d
Technically, anything that has been modified from the raw camera sensor data is a “filter” if you consider filter as any image manipulation
venusaur@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Sounds good. Put a watermark on it if it has a filter or otherwise manipulated.
klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe · 3 pts · 333d
How about one of those sliders where you reveal the original image and it can be half and half? Make it a capital crime not to do it. Auto-levels with no original? Straight to jail.
venusaur@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Love it. An instant felony and banned from posting pictures in media for the rest of your life. If you break that law, then your face is removed.
klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe · 2 pts · 332d
Eyes without a face!!!
venusaur@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 332d
Got no human grace
lostme@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
if the law applied exactly as the person above you described, it would be utterly useless, because every single photo you'll see online would be marked as manipulated. people don't post raw sensor data, online platforms don't accept raw sensor data, in many cases it's difficult to even get the data raw and not as a jpeg
venusaur@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
There’s a reasonable threshold. I’m just playing along with devil’s advocate.
curiousaur@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 333d
I looked into this, since I build phone answering voice agents. It's only on social media.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 333d
Love my state
beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com · 1 pts · 229d
ezterry@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 332d
So a new line in the GDPR popup indicating all chat on this site is "AI" (llm?) Driven.. For you to close along with the chat window so youn can just read the product page.
blave@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 333d
Hopefully, there will soon be a law which calls for the immediate and public execution of anyone who even thinks the term “AI”
Nothing has ever been produced from it other than reasons to kill the creator.
Disagree? Please include your home address. Someone will be around to take care of you very soon. 😊