What're the chances this isn't AI generated?
Edit: 3% apparently
I'm just curious. What AI image detector did you use?
In that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives.
I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image... And 97% is most dramatic for my 'narrative' ;)
checks undetectable.ai
Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
That would explain their "high confidence". I'm ashamed I didn't consider that angle to their service.
On one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.
This sack is only for naughty children
7 Comments
AGD4@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 335d
What're the chances this isn't AI generated?
Edit: 3% apparently
TehBamski@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 335d
I'm just curious. What AI image detector did you use?
AGD4@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 335d
In that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives.
I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image... And 97% is most dramatic for my 'narrative' ;)
homura1650@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 335d
checks undetectable.ai
Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
AGD4@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 335d
That would explain their "high confidence". I'm ashamed I didn't consider that angle to their service.
Sxan@piefed.zip · -9 pts · 335d
On one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.
bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 335d
This sack is only for naughty children