Positivity 😇

489 points · 23 comments · view on lemmy.world

23 Comments

pulsewidth@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 273d (2 replies)

Why is this cropped and scrubbed so that we can't see who the original artist is?

salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 273d (1 reply)

Looks like the original source is @mushroommovie. The scrubbing seems to have removed a boredpanda watermark.

pulsewidth@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 272d

Thanks for that, they have a bunch of silly fun stuff on Giphy and found their original comics from your info.

https://giphy.com/mushroommovie

https://m.webtoons.com/en/canvas/silly-shroomans/positivity/viewer?title_no=45042&episode_no=839

kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 273d

That's the toxic positivity people are talking about!

zxqwas@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 273d (8 replies)

Can you cause fission with protons instead of neutrons?

gnutrino@programming.dev · 11 pts · 273d

Yes if they have enough energy (see for example https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-74045-5). What you won't get with proton-induced fission is an explosion as the fission doesn't emit protons which can go on to cause further fissions so there's no chain reaction (unless you already have a critical mass for normal neutron-induced fission in which case it's going to explode even without the protons).

Egonallanon@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 273d (3 replies)

If you're adding a proton wouldn't it be fusion? Which also releases a bucket load of energy.

SmoothOperator@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 273d

The largest amount of energy is released from fusing two hydrogens into helium. The atom in the comic looks much heavier than hydrogen.

Also a chain fusion reaction is required for an explosion. The comic just shows non-explosive ionisation.

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 7 pts · 273d

It looks like a heavy element so fusion would be net negative energy

zxqwas@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 273d

Possibly but the common fusions are using isotopes of H, He, Li with some amount of neutrons, not naked protons.

Heavier elements as the big blob is releases a lot less energy, and the really heavy ones are not exothermic.

Digit@lemmy.wtf · 7 pts · 273d

Maybe need an accompanying alternative version of the cartoon, "be more neutral".

marcos@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 272d
[ removed ]
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 272d

yeah, i think it's possible to split U-238 with fast protons. but the reproduction factor (how many new particles are emitted for every particle that you used to start the reaction) is smaller than 1, so it can't explode that way.

PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org · 15 pts · 273d (5 replies)

So mushrooms are made of atoms...but then if a mushroom feeds an atom a proton, the atom grows into a bigger, stronger mushroom 🤔

petersr@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 273d

And in classical enriched uranium fission, atoms would be "fed" neutrons, not protons. So nothing makes sense.

OpenStars@piefed.social · 4 pts · 273d (2 replies)

I wonder how powerful Mario would get if he took that mushroom (cloud)?

crawancon@piefed.social · 3 pts · 272d (1 reply)

well sprouting a raccoon tail, turning into a statue, or shooting fireballs out of his hands could support this ...mushroom theory of yours .

webp@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 273d

Science is fascinating.

Krudler@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 272d

That's not how nuclear fission works.

hOrni@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 273d (1 reply)

So to make a nuclear bomb, all we need are some atoms and mushrooms. Got it, will try later.

general_kitten@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 273d

dont forget the surplus proton

Admetus@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 273d

I thought a heavy nucleus needs an extra neutron for it to go poot.

Digit@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 273d

And the positivity ninnies will still try to spin that as something positive.