Justice Department begins releasing long-awaited files tied to Epstein sex trafficking investigation

https://apnews.com/article/release-epstein-files-justice-department-trump-f919d9dc9c3957cb2bd2c9c1a14b533c

127 points · 16 comments · view on lemmy.world

16 Comments

MonkeyDumpster@lemmy.org · 46 pts · 248d (9 replies)

[redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]

criss_cross@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 248d (7 replies)

There’s literally a 119 page grand jury testimony that’s fully redacted.

Over 90% of the docs are fully redacted.

Like Jesus talk about Malicious Compliance

EDIT: adding a link

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf

meco03211@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 248d (5 replies)

Except they aren't complying. They haven't released as much as they should have.

Gerudo@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 248d

They were also only supposed to redeact victim information.

criss_cross@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 248d (3 replies)

True. There’s also supposed to be explanations for these and right now there’s jack shit.

monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d (2 replies)

I think they have 15 days to provide explanations for the redactions.

Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 248d

Each page has trump's name mentioned on it, all 119 pages. Several times per page

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 248d

And when they don't.......nothing will be done about it

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 248d

That's not malicious compliance, that's just noncompliance. Maybe it technically meets the definition of malicious compliance but I simply refuse to call it that

Rhoeri@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d

Yeah. I honesty don’t know why anyone bothers or cares at this point.

santa@sh.itjust.works · 27 pts · 248d (2 replies)

⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️D⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️

human@slrpnk.net · 17 pts · 248d

D⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛p

negativenull@piefed.world · 15 pts · 248d

⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️ Clinton⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️

ieatpwns@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 247d

Lexam@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 248d (1 reply)

How long do you think it will take someone with the skills to unredact and release the actual documents.

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d

The committees have it don't they? They could leak it due to them just reacting everything.