Numbers here are misleading :
(13% and 25% of CO2 produced during manufacturing)
These percentage are based on what is produce during the year while existing cement things that are picking up CO2 were fabricated in the span of many decades.
::: spoiler trivial example to illustrate what i am saying here
...
supposed we are making each year one new building for 100 years in a row.
After that time, we have 100 buildings picking up CO2 from the air but in that year we create only one new building.
Now, we calculate total amount of CO2 picked up by 100 building divided by CO2 emitted to build this new single building.
This is how misleading this calculation is.
in fact if we were to make new buildings at a steady pace for long enough, we would eventually reach "kinetic equilibrium" in which the rate of CO2 picked up is equal to the rate of CO2 emitted : so we would reach 100% of annual CO2 production. (equilibrium)
:::
6 Comments
Nomecks@lemmy.ca · 73 pts · 242d
This corresponds to roughly 13 percent of the process emissions — the CO2 released by the underlying chemical reaction — in U.S. cement manufacturing.
A_A@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 242d
Numbers here are misleading :
(13% and 25% of CO
2produced during manufacturing)These percentage are based on what is produce during the year while existing cement things that are picking up CO
2were fabricated in the span of many decades.::: spoiler trivial example to illustrate what i am saying here
...
supposed we are making each year one new building for 100 years in a row.
After that time, we have 100 buildings picking up CO
2from the air but in that year we create only one new building.Now, we calculate total amount of CO
2picked up by 100 building divided by CO2emitted to build this new single building.This is how misleading this calculation is.
in fact if we were to make new buildings at a steady pace for long enough, we would eventually reach "kinetic equilibrium" in which the rate of CO
2picked up is equal to the rate of CO2emitted : so we would reach 100% of annual CO2 production. (equilibrium) :::MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 241d
This is old news. And it doesn't pull enough to offset the CO² produced from chalk burning.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 242d
Your move trees.
MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 242d
Now now, let's not be hasty...
Hule@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 242d
The Happening?