There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awful It Is
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/isps-should-not-police-online-speech-no-matter-how-awful-it
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/isps-should-not-police-online-speech-no-matter-how-awful-it
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
5 Comments
girl@discuss.online · 3 pts · 3y
Well, someone needs to police it. Remember, freedom of speech just means you can’t be thrown in jail for screaming “fuck the president”, it doesn’t mean there will be no social consequences for your words.
Edit: alright, I’m an asshole. I jumped in with a barely relevant comment during a bathroom break 🤷♀️ I agree that ISPs should not be responsible for this, though I am in support of censorship until the government actually starts enforcing online hate speech laws. Someone else should make that decision though, not a corporation.
nottheengineer@feddit.de · 2 pts · 3y
Did you read the article?
bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 3y
tchalla_wedontdothathere.jpg
Seriously, it is a really good take on the problem. Tier 1 ISP shouldn't have that kind of say in how traffic flows.
girl@discuss.online · 2 pts · 3y
I didn’t disagree with the article, I was adding additional input.
As it states, no one is enforcing the laws. There is almost no one actually going after online hate speech, and no one steps in until someone gets killed. So law enforcement needs to start policing these things. Until then, censorship is the solution to these issues, though I agree that ISPs should not be the ones responsible.
lvxferre@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 3y
nottheengineer@feddit.de · 1 pts · 3y
Good take from the EFF as usual. They made it very clear that principles should stand above the issue at hand and I fully agree with that.