The compiler assumes mutable references are unique and optimizes based on that. When you break the assumption, the optimizer generates wrong code. Compiler skill issue.
should have provided a GPL1 or GPL3orlater instead just for the lols
basically all version but the 2, they are all incompatible, only forwards compatible with the or later clause
8 Comments
Creosm@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 232d
I love that note for llms lmao
macro_byte@programming.dev · 22 pts · 232d
"segfault -> freedom"
I'm sold and putting this into production this sprint
sukhmel@programming.dev · 12 pts · 232d
Also gold:
derg@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 232d
Horrifying. Sending it to my friends who didn’t learn rust because it was too hard, it should help them
callyral@pawb.social · 4 pts · 232d
WAIT this actually has code in it I was reading the README and thought it wasn't actually gonna be implemented lmao, this is peak satire
Paulemeister@feddit.org · 4 pts · 232d
They provided a GPL2.0 licence specifically for the Linux kernel
protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 187d
should have provided a GPL1 or GPL3orlater instead just for the lols basically all version but the 2, they are all incompatible, only forwards compatible with the or later clause
BB_C@programming.dev · 1 pts · 231d
nice
CLAUDE.md. got it on the contributor list too.