Linux is not a great home desktop OS.

3 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

nesc@lemmy.cafe · 8 pts · 251d (10 replies)

Linux is a great home desktop os, haiku is alright in vm.

KiwiTB@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 251d (9 replies)

While haiku has a long way to go, right now Linux is still a terrible desktop OS.

nesc@lemmy.cafe · 5 pts · 251d (1 reply)

It might be a terrible desktop OS, we just don't have anything better. So it kind of great desktop OS.

KiwiTB@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 251d

Agreed

urheber@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 251d (6 replies)

How so? Ive used it since I was 12 and I love it.

KiwiTB@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 251d (5 replies)
  1. It's built on concepts from the 60s.
  2. It's not user friendly in the slightest
  3. It focuses on speed over security.

As an example

Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com · 2 pts · 251d

Sounds like a philosophical answer to a technical question. What distro, what desktop environment are we talking about? What were you unable to do, what was impractical? Surely a terrible OS has more to show than three vague bullet points...

urheber@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 250d (3 replies)

From the sixties... LOL how so? I excpected a little more of an explanation

KiwiTB@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 250d (2 replies)

It's a literal UNIX clone. That should be obvious.

arthur@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 211d

Mac OS is literally Unix, not a clone, is it better or worse than Linux in that regard?

urheber@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 250d

Thanks bro