Telly has only delivered 35,000 of its free televisions with always-on ads

https://www.engadget.com/home/home-theater/telly-has-only-delivered-35000-of-its-free-televisions-with-always-on-ads-215033698.html?src=rss

cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/technology/p/978758/telly-has-only-delivered-35000-of-its-free-televisions-with-always-on-ads

128 points · 21 comments · view on lemmy.world

21 Comments

DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 208d (8 replies)

I imagine one could replace the hardware with something else to drive the display portion. It'd take knowledge and a soldering iron, but I'm sure it's doable.

Probably they have some sort of sensor behind the lower screen that can tell if it's covered. I wonder how sophisticated that is. Perhaps, rather than covering it completely, it could be obscured behind a crystal pattern plastic sheet, like is used for privacy. It would still let the light through, but it would just be an incoherent light pattern. Build a box to enclose the bottom half, and hold the sheet out a few inches in front of the panel.

EDIT: The correct way to deal with it is to disable the backlight on the bottom display. Found a reddit post about it. It's cheap and easy enough to do if you have a soldering iron.

EDIT 2: Apparently it does not have a way to detect if the bottom screen is blocked. Fools. Just build a box around the bottom part, and you're done. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qD-jaukv85U

Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 208d

I would have no objections to literally spray painting that lower screen Tremclad Black. Is that all the tv can do though? I would imagine it's also stealing as much data of yours as it can and possibly even listening in. Also what if there's ad sound...?

givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 208d

The thing is, screens are cheap and there's no real reason to replace unless you're chasing top of the line which this isn't.

Save ~$100 now to always have an ad playing isn't a great deal

unmagical@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 208d (4 replies)

I read their TOS when this first was announced and they had something like they'll bill you the full cost of the TV if you tamper or obscure it and they deemed the cost of the TV as $1k USD.

Saapas@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 208d (2 replies)

How would they know you've done it? Do they have a way to detect you putting a sheet in front of the bottom screen?

unmagical@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 208d (1 reply)

There is a camera on the front. That could be used to detect obstructions or for eye tracking. There could also be additional sensors by the bottom screen that can detect obstructions.

If you fail to plug the TV into the internet within 5 days of receiving and keep it connected they'll charge you $1000. If you take it apart they'll charge you $1000.

The video above does not go into detail on the long term implications of obstruction and it's possible the TV does not react immediately to an obstruction.

p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 207d

There is a camera on the front.

Camera inside my house? That's a non-starter for me.

EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 207d

and they deemed the cost of the TV as $1k USD.

Lol, do you know what $1K will get you for a TV these days?

fullsquare@awful.systems · 2 pts · 208d

if there was a way of faking presence of lower display, then you have free tv and extra screen

this is some idiocracy level shit tho

regdog@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 208d

Advertising is a curse on humanity

NullPointerException@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 208d

And a free tv.

EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 11 pts · 207d (2 replies)

Because it's a stupid idea that no one asked for.

TVs have gotten really cheap, but even if you can't afford those they are easy to find at thrift shops or even people giving them away if you have a little bit of patience. Suffice it to say, this has a very narrow target audience.

These are basically e-waste.

BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 207d (1 reply)

So ready for them to become e-waste.

Can you imagine the possibilities on re-purposing these if they get cheap enough to experiment with after the company goes bankrupt.

pupbiru@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 207d

there’s likely very little experimentation needed… ripping the panel out and attaching an HDMI controller from aliexpress to it would likely be extremely straight forward

apple is one of the most proprietary companies in existence and you can do this easily with ipad screens and generic controllers… the same goes for most panels: there’s really not that much difference in the actual “expensive” part, and afaik very little you can do to protect it from this kind of thing

snowgaze@masto.pt · 7 pts · 208d
[ removed ]
Marthirial@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 208d

Just mount the soundbar on top of that shit.

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 208d (3 replies)
SpacePanda@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 207d (2 replies)

Holy shit this eerie

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 206d (1 reply)

It is from the black mirror episode common people. She is being kept alive by a brain implant but it is a subscription service that enshitifies

SpacePanda@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 205d

Context makes it worse lol

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 208d

It's as popular as the Fire Phone!

wesdym@mastodon.social · 1 pts · 207d

@bossito TOS says they'll send some goons to your home to kick you in the crotch if they decide they don't like your face.

But hey, free TV!