I love all my statements equally. (I don't care for GOTO)

381 points · 23 comments · view on lemmy.world

23 Comments

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 52 pts · 2y (6 replies)

"This would be better if it were covered in rust"

bob_wiley@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 2y (4 replies)
[ removed ]
TheYear2525@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Gee whiz, that pun was basic!

entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 2y

They can't all be perls before swine

nogrub@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

i C what you did there

yum13241@lemm.ee · -4 pts · 2y

Maybe too BASIC.

nieceandtows@programming.dev · 8 pts · 2y

They’ve played us for absolute fools!

QuazarOmega@lemy.lol · 43 pts · 2y (4 replies)

This engine is not the best practice

andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun · 40 pts · 2y (3 replies)

This engine is an antipattern.

QuazarOmega@lemy.lol · 11 pts · 2y (1 reply)

We're dissing Unity here right?

andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun · 6 pts · 2y

Could also be your least favorite container engine. Or rules engine. Man, we really like to call things engines don't we?

Knusper@feddit.de · 4 pts · 2y

This engine is not idiomatic.

TootSweet@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 2y (9 replies)

"Documentation considered harmful" - my coworkers probably.

railsdev@programming.dev · 22 pts · 2y (8 replies)
[ removed ]
redcalcium@lemmy.institute · 11 pts · 2y (1 reply)

It perfectly makes sense if you think like me.

-- a deranged programmer

QuazarOmega@lemy.lol · 9 pts · 2y

-- a deranged programmer

Aren't we all?

docAvid@midwest.social · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Using "self documenting" as a blanket excuse to not document things that need it is inexcusable, yes, but I'd rather work on code written by somebody who seriously thinks about how to make it clean and self documenting, and then documents whatever still needs it as well, than on code written by somebody who doesn't make that effort, but documents heavily. And as for people who claim they're documenting everything, when the documentation is function fooTheBar() // foos the bar, they can eat a bag of docs.

railsdev@programming.dev · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
TheYear2525@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)
bool ticket2387_ac3 = true; // TODO
if (!ticket2387_ac3) return;
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2y

ticket is too exposed, what if they reverse engineer the name? just use t2387ac3 instead it saves time

UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y

facts

hairyballs@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y

My coworkers do document the code:

/// Returns a list of foos, given a bar. 
fn get_foos_from_bar(bar: Bar)
princess@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 2y (2 replies)
profoundlynerdy@programming.dev · 4 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Perl has entered the chat.

WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

No, that's just some random line noise.

gregorum@lemm.ee · 7 pts · 2y
ifelse 
    eatme