Oddly enough the US Supreme Court took Charles' arguments to heart by ruling that the President is immune from prosecution for any official acts he takes while in office.
That's what I said. This is not the first time a member of the royal family ended up in the Tower. And the one or other was subsequently asked to put his or her head on this comfty block of wood, and don't mind the blood stains...
7 Comments
Grimy@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 168d
As far as I know, Charles never committed any other acts of treason after that, so maybe it can work for molesting children too.
kingofras@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 168d
See, I like this. The scientific approach. No need to get all barbaric about this.
percent@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 168d
I heard he's actually in trouble for financial stuff, not the sexual stuff.
(I have not verified this, so I might be wrong)
DakRalter@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 167d
It's for leaking state secrets to Epstein, not the other stuff he was doing there. Let's hope that investigation comes next.
sepi@piefed.social · 15 pts · 168d
Way to get me all hot and bothered like this
stinerman@feddit.online · 6 pts · 167d
Oddly enough the US Supreme Court took Charles' arguments to heart by ruling that the President is immune from prosecution for any official acts he takes while in office.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 167d
That's what I said. This is not the first time a member of the royal family ended up in the Tower. And the one or other was subsequently asked to put his or her head on this comfty block of wood, and don't mind the blood stains...