c/flippanarchy · by Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 204dcan't have one without the other cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34461957 234 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world
9 Comments
anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 204d
Damn it's like they're inextricably linked or something idk
Allero@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 203d
Any drawbacks? Positive change on all sides!
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 202d
PragerU is shaking in their boots because they know that world is a world which won't have them in it.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 204d
Still waiting to see the EU approach with a CO2 currency (⚠️this is a remembering and I do not know the source; fact check required⚠️)
BlackLaZoR@fedia.io · 2 pts · 204d
EU has tradable CO2 certificates. Is that what you meant by 'currency'?
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 203d
Maybe, yes, I thought it was something different…
https://www.epa.ie/our-services/licensing/climate-change/eu-emissions-trading-system-/
lurch@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 204d
Somehow I doubt the big corrupt polluters would stop in other economic systems, but there's only one way to find out.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 5 pts · 204d
The idea is that the big corrupt polluters would cease to exist and be replaced with smaller and weaker corrupt polluters. The only reason we haven't hit net zero yet is corporate lobbying; remove that and you're halfway there.
BlackLaZoR@fedia.io · 0 pts · 204d
Meanwhile capitalism moves to renewable power...