Just a heads up, you may wanna reconsider this well-intended comment because it kinda reads like you're suggesting that child abuse is top tier at first glance
So, should it be F tier? I'm just going by the accuracy bit that @LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca posted. In no way, shape, or form am I condoning anything CA.
With content as dangerous as this, it is more about the lack of context in your post when viewed standalone. A screenshot of just your message without the surrounding thread would look extremely questionable. Much better if you actually titled the tier list.
For sure! I too use Premium, and I pay for it myself because I use Youtube Music all day every day at work. Way back when they took away the downvote button I immediately found a way to bring it back.
Certainly seems that way with how they're driving the country into the ground. First stop, 1950s, where only rich white men had power. Full steam crude oil ahead.
22 Comments
LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca · 98 pts · 165d
For impact: hateful or abusive content
For accuracy: child abuse
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 165d
I feel like this could almost become a tier list for the entire administration at this point.
S - Child Abuse
A - Hateful or abusive content
A - Violent or repulsive content
A- Harmful or dangerous acts
A - Spam or misleading
F - Sexual content (?)
bearboiblake@pawb.social · 12 pts · 165d
Just a heads up, you may wanna reconsider this well-intended comment because it kinda reads like you're suggesting that child abuse is top tier at first glance
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 165d
So, should it be F tier? I'm just going by the accuracy bit that @LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca posted. In no way, shape, or form am I condoning anything CA.
ramune@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 165d
With content as dangerous as this, it is more about the lack of context in your post when viewed standalone. A screenshot of just your message without the surrounding thread would look extremely questionable. Much better if you actually titled the tier list.
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 165d
Makes sense. Editing ASAP.
humanamerican@lemmy.zip · 39 pts · 165d
Should be check boxes instead of radio buttons.
Agrivar@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 165d
I love that it's already got ~1k more downvotes than up, despite your average YouTuber not even having access to the down vote button!
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 165d
Enhancer for Youtube adds it back, won't use it without it, and I use Premium (friend pays for it tho).
Agrivar@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 165d
For sure! I too use Premium, and I pay for it myself because I use Youtube Music all day every day at work. Way back when they took away the downvote button I immediately found a way to bring it back.
atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 165d
they still have access to the downvote button, the total number is just hidden
Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 165d
Back to what? The Dark Ages?
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 165d
Certainly seems that way with how they're driving the country into the ground. First stop, 1950s, where only rich white men had power. Full
steamcrude oil ahead.I'll go ahead and get my boomstick.
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 165d
It's definitly not sexual content. They mean nudity and porn and stuff. That's not in this... I hope
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 165d
Oh deer god... same. shudder
TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 164d
Nudity isn't inherently sexual, and sex isn't inherently inappropriate
pewpew@feddit.it · 15 pts · 165d
This sounds like the white house's goal checklist
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social · 10 pts · 165d
All of the above
DmMacniel@feddit.org · 7 pts · 165d
Multi Report it is.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 165d
All of em
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 3 pts · 165d
I'm doing my part
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PQ7l905aVM
linkinkampf19@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 165d
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 165d