Is it really a failed state when most of its problems have been caused by a major outside aggressive influence? Wouldn't a failed state be when it has failed internally without sanctions or embargoes thanks to a certain global bully to its north.
Not a failed state, if it had failed it would be a failed country. It's clear that if it's failing it's because of external influences, but regardless, don't reduce it's sovereignty into a "state", it's a proper country.
4 Comments
Mantzy81@aussie.zone · 25 pts · 186d
Is it really a failed state when most of its problems have been caused by a major outside aggressive influence? Wouldn't a failed state be when it has failed internally without sanctions or embargoes thanks to a certain global bully to its north.
not_that_guy05@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 186d
If it was a failed state their would be no laws. WTF kind of question is this? They are under siege as well.
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 186d
Not a failed state, if it had failed it would be a failed country. It's clear that if it's failing it's because of external influences, but regardless, don't reduce it's sovereignty into a "state", it's a proper country.
unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 185d
Cuba is a failed state. But not because it failed. Because the others failed it.
StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 186d