I’ve gotten literal death threats for saying this before, but, I liked Brand New Day way more than anything from the JMS run. I liked the Dan Slott era way more, and Superior was a fucking blast.
This is the re-re-reboot so Sony can pointlessly hold onto the rights to Spider-Man and company, right? I find it hard to believe that it's been profitable enough to attempt to maintain, what with the relatively weak villain-centric films no one asked for.
I can understand Tom Holland aging out of the character as they all eventually do, fine and dandy. Just seems that selling this wedge of Marvel property to Disney for a few billion might strangely be the better move.
Surprised no one else pointed this out, but no this is not the re-re-reboot of Sony Pictures Universe of Marvel Characters. Tom Holland's Spidey exists in the mainline MCU and his movies have all (to this date) been made with Marvel. The godawful side character movies are what's getting rebooted.
Right there with ya. I project more into the billions, but the stubbornness persists. The notion of a unified Marvel cinematic universe continues to elude us. Oh well.
11 Comments
inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 151d
Ominous to chose the most universally reviled spidey story. Gonna retcon all that MCU aren't ya Sony?
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 150d
I’ve gotten literal death threats for saying this before, but, I liked Brand New Day way more than anything from the JMS run. I liked the Dan Slott era way more, and Superior was a fucking blast.
Glytch@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 150d
See I can understand making a deal with Mephisto to bring back Aunt Tomei.
EarMaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 150d
For a short moment I was excited because I thought it would be the third Spiderverse movie…
Railcar8095@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 150d
Your comment is how I realized it's not :(
My care levels have plummeted
ummthatguy@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 151d
This is the re-re-reboot so Sony can pointlessly hold onto the rights to Spider-Man and company, right? I find it hard to believe that it's been profitable enough to attempt to maintain, what with the relatively weak villain-centric films no one asked for.
I can understand Tom Holland aging out of the character as they all eventually do, fine and dandy. Just seems that selling this wedge of Marvel property to Disney for a few billion might strangely be the better move.
Agrivar@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 151d
Surprised no one else pointed this out, but no this is not the re-re-reboot of Sony Pictures Universe of Marvel Characters. Tom Holland's Spidey exists in the mainline MCU and his movies have all (to this date) been made with Marvel. The godawful side character movies are what's getting rebooted.
Microw@piefed.zip · 6 pts · 151d
Iirc the first two Tom Holland movies were basically made by Marvel for Sony, since the last one it's more of a cooperation effort
Agrivar@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 151d
You could be right, but my point stands - Holland's Spidey movies have nothing to do with the rest of the Sony films that are getting a "reboot."
David_Eight@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 151d
Why would Sony ever sell spiderman back, the last three spiderman movies made almost 4 billion dollars?
Worldwide box office:
Spider-Man: Homecoming - $880,166,924
Spider-Man: Far From Home - $1,131,927,996
Spider-Man: No Way Home - $1,926,899,310
superj104@thebrainbin.org · 8 pts · 151d
ummthatguy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 151d
Right there with ya. I project more into the billions, but the stubbornness persists. The notion of a unified Marvel cinematic universe continues to elude us. Oh well.