Fighting without it being fair for both sides and winning not being due to military tactics is just not British what what.
Well, you see, George, I did like it, back in the old days when the prerequisite of a British campaign was that the enemy should under no circumstances carry guns -- even spears made us think twice. The kind of people we liked to fight were two feet tall and armed with dry grass.
I think it has been looked at and even solved; the SA-80 was developed as a rifle that no other military would would be able to use. Or was that no other military would want to use? Either way, job done.
5 Comments
Mantzy81@aussie.zone · 10 pts · 152d
Fighting without it being fair for both sides and winning not being due to military tactics is just not British what what.
Overwhelming firepower is a bit gauche don't you know. Those Yankees just don't understand.
Also, real talk, that's also why the US loses so often.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 5 pts · 152d
nilaus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 152d
Well said captain B.
MohamedMoney@feddit.org · 8 pts · 152d
Brits with guns
Brits with guns
Easy does it, easy does it, they’ve got something to say no to
Djehngo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 152d
I think it has been looked at and even solved; the SA-80 was developed as a rifle that no other military would would be able to use. Or was that no other military would want to use? Either way, job done.