Over 26 hours of web browsing in one test.
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260326004231/https://www.theverge.com/tech/901155/dell-xps-16-best-battery-lg-display-1hz-panther-lake-intel
https://www.theverge.com/tech/901155/dell-xps-16-best-battery-lg-display-1hz-panther-lake-intel
Over 26 hours of web browsing in one test.
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260326004231/https://www.theverge.com/tech/901155/dell-xps-16-best-battery-lg-display-1hz-panther-lake-intel
7 Comments
XLE@piefed.social · 12 pts · 157d
Starting at $1750, they're
competing withsurpassing Apple in the price department(Edit: added right price)
kautau@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 157d
And
On a 16 inch screen that’s gross
XLE@piefed.social · 1 pts · 156d
To be fair to Dell, Apple's high-resolution displays might have toned-down resolutions too. The Mac Neo ships with a lower default resolution than what it can fully handle, if I understand the settings right.
kautau@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 156d
Still 219 PPI compared to 146 PPI at 500 nits brightness for $500. Granted that iPad chip is going to crawl on some stuff. and the MacBook Air, which is likely far more performant than either is $1099 base instead of $1700+ for the dell. I enjoy all competition but intel chips are still way less performant than the m series in terms of power consumption
PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social · 6 pts · 157d
The XPS line has always been their competitor to MacBooks though.
paraphrand@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 157d
People don’t understand that Apple just never chose to compete in the $500 laptop range, until, well, this year…
XLE@piefed.social · 2 pts · 156d
The least expensive current-gen MacBook after the Neo is $1100 (less if you buy a previous generation, which is apparently common practice); the Dell in the article is $1750.
Apple's other products are expensive, but this is a whole new level of it.