Claude mixes up who said what and that's not OK

https://dwyer.co.za/static/claude-mixes-up-who-said-what-and-thats-not-ok.html

Comments

10 points · 5 comments · view on lemmy.world

5 Comments

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 133d (2 replies)

Yeah no that is actually completely fine, because people that rely on slop deserve what they get.

DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 1 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Okay but since Claude is calling in missile strikes, diagnosing patients, and thinking for half the business majors on the planet I don't think that logic actually applies as fully as you think.

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 131d

What? All of those people (military, doctors scientists, financial advisors, lawyers, etc.) should be held responsible and their victims should get recognition or payouts.

xxce2AAb@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 133d

Jesus. Why would it even be possible for it to have any influence on prompt input in the first place?

jeffep@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 133d

I mean... It just says things others said before after blending them a lil bit, right? That's its entire thing?