MF couldn't even write his own bullshit article of lies. There are three sections of bullet points, but the third is numbered for some reason.
The writing is manipulative, the points are partial to full lies. This whole thing sucks. I can't believe I took time out of my morning to read this drivel.
I know and love the general threadiverse pushback against big tech bullshit, of which AI is a monstrously overgrown appendage, but I do wish it wasn't quite so militant in cases like this post. It's not mindless AI boosting (it's not AI boosting at all -- the author directly states they're ambivalent about AI), it's a genuine expression of opinions that I think are, if nothing else, interesting.
I don't think it deserves to be downvoted. But I'd love to hear people's counterarguments.
9 Comments
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 125d
MF couldn't even write his own bullshit article of lies. There are three sections of bullet points, but the third is numbered for some reason.
The writing is manipulative, the points are partial to full lies. This whole thing sucks. I can't believe I took time out of my morning to read this drivel.
apparia@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 125d
The third one is the footnotes. That'd be the reason.
Personally I didn't clock the article as slop; having footnotes in the first place is a credit towards that.
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 125d
I'll have to wait until I'm back home to give a proper reply, but the article reads really poorly.
etherphon@piefed.world · 7 pts · 125d
Akh@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 125d
Conservatives are protecting pedophiles. They are not credible people
onlinepersona@programming.dev · 1 pts · 124d
Release the Epstein files!
StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 125d
mrdown@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 125d
I am not anti ai but that article title is so dumb
apparia@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 125d
I know and love the general threadiverse pushback against big tech bullshit, of which AI is a monstrously overgrown appendage, but I do wish it wasn't quite so militant in cases like this post. It's not mindless AI boosting (it's not AI boosting at all -- the author directly states they're ambivalent about AI), it's a genuine expression of opinions that I think are, if nothing else, interesting.
I don't think it deserves to be downvoted. But I'd love to hear people's counterarguments.
aldhissla@piefed.world · 1 pts · 125d
I see sloppy slop-shilling, I downvote it.
randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 125d
Absolute drivel.