The court’s decision hinges on procedural and constitutional arguments about how the amendment was passed, including timing requirements and legislative steps, the kinds of disputes appellate courts often revisit, especially when they collide with a direct vote of the people.
So they're arguing timing, not validity it sounds like. I'd be interested to hear exactly what these timing issues are they're hanging their objection on.
5 Comments
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 121d
So they're arguing timing, not validity it sounds like. I'd be interested to hear exactly what these timing issues are they're hanging their objection on.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 121d
Probably whatever they can make up to overturn it
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 121d
Sure, but when they played their strongest card it has quite a weak showing.
meco03211@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 121d
They need time to play more cards. That's the timing issue.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 3 pts · 121d
Will the chuds of mordor resist? Of course not!