Microsoft: Fully Automating Supply Chain Attacks since 2026!

https://xcancel.com/agilejebrim/status/2047567975515902091

(Not me, just providing the source)

127 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

embed_me@programming.dev · 26 pts · 99d (3 replies)

Maybe the personal account used the same ssh key?

Dumhuvud@programming.dev · 20 pts · 99d

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. Making a commit and pushing to a remote repository are two different, completely unrelated, things.

felbane@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 98d

https://xcancel.com/AgileJebrim/status/2047686630656364883#m

I... think this person just might be dense or have brain rot or something. Calling git's branching and merging model an "issue" is a bit of a wild take.

Edit: after browsing their re-tweets a bit... yep, confirmed, non functional brain. They're reposting Fox News and Greg Abbott. 🙄

tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 98d

GH doesn't allow multiple accounts to use the same SSH key

Sanctus@anarchist.nexus · 24 pts · 99d (2 replies)

https://xcancel.com/agilejebrim/status/2047567975515902091

Just add the 'cancel' after x before you post it please.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 99d (1 reply)

Noted and updated.

Sorry, don't often post twitter links, didn't realize it was that simple.

Sanctus@anarchist.nexus · 12 pts · 99d

Spread the word. Fuck Twitter ❤️

mabeledo@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 98d (1 reply)

I don’t like GitHub, but this looks like they had someone using an authorized SSH key, but the git client was configured to post some unknown email address. Happens all the time.

Would be funny if they only find out once they have migrated off GitHub though.

resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe · 1 pts · 98d

Probably. See weird names and emails from what’s obviously the same person all the time.

KindaABigDyl@programming.dev · 5 pts · 100d (7 replies)

I am begrudgingly moving to gitlab, slowly but surely

onlinepersona@programming.dev · 9 pts · 100d (3 replies)

Why not Codeberg?

firelizzard@programming.dev · 3 pts · 100d

Codeberg isn’t viable for proprietary software

KindaABigDyl@programming.dev · 1 pts · 91d (1 reply)

Bc I've never heard of that

onlinepersona@programming.dev · 2 pts · 90d

Now you have ;)

firelizzard@programming.dev · 4 pts · 100d (2 replies)

Why begrudgingly?

KindaABigDyl@programming.dev · 2 pts · 91d (1 reply)

I just dont enjoy it. It feels extremely sluggish, the ui is far more confusing with 100s of menus and weird names, and it doesnt have any basic file hosting for releases which is annoying. There are more but it's basically just lots of annoying little things that are super inconvenient.

firelizzard@programming.dev · 2 pts · 91d

I liked it ~5 years ago when it was mostly Git + project management + excellent CI. I agree that it’s gotten really messy since then. Way too many features IDGAF about.