Who the hell comes up with ideas like these?

67 points · 16 comments · view on lemmy.world

16 Comments

nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 136d (5 replies)

How? Did the “inventor” just slam 2 words into each other and called it a day? Just how?

A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 136d (4 replies)

I mean theres also anarcho-totalitarianism so yeah 🤷

stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 136d (3 replies)

My favorite example of anarcho-bullshittism is anarcho-monarchism, the most famous proponent of which was J. R. R. Tolkien. No, really.

PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 136d (1 reply)

To me that reads as a guy (Tolkien) coming to grips with reality about a handful of things but then stopping short. Wishing to retreat, really, to a "simpler" time, from his perspective (read: lib shit, tbh). His "anarchism" seems real, in that he sees clearly the fundamental issue with humans operating in a deeply articulated government structure - those who see it as a game, game it well.

Not exactly defending the guy, I don't actually know him lol, but there wasn't much "and that's why monarchy should be preferred", I was kinda looking to see what he'd say there. Seemed more just "and people doing more of their own governance happened and was clearly better under a smaller "state". Like a good old fashioned monarchy, I liked that better and not just me, wasn't that better? record-scratch-noise"

So I guess on balance I read "anarcho-lib-shit" over "anarcho-monarchism" overall lol 🤷‍♂️

[Edit to add - thanks for the share, not grumping at ya, just enjoying what ya shared]

DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 6 pts · 136d

In other words, what was Aragorn's tax policy? Tolkien never says because he refuses the reality that a king needs one.

A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 135d

I dunno, I think he meant anarchism but with a symbolic monarch who has soft power only.

hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 18 pts · 136d

We don't have infinite monkeys writing with typewriters, but 8 billion is a lot

alapakala@quokk.au · 11 pts · 136d

They have names. Select «History» to find out exactly.

The AnFash perspective does squarely lie in fascism. You don't need a monopoly on violence to have supremacy over minorities. Rightfully, the praxis should be called “decentralized fascism.” Or “DecenFash.”

merde@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 136d (3 replies)

i guess they have no idea about what any of those words mean 🤷

A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 136d (2 replies)

Anarchism is about removing violence from human relations. Facism is about doing violence towards other humans.

Pandantic@midwest.social · 1 pts · 136d

But only the humans they don't like!

merde@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 135d

Anarchism is about removing violence from human relations.

not necessarily. Did you read a little about histories of Anarchisms?

Coolkat@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 136d

This is just called a cult, most probably a death cult. Freedom to be happily exploited by a leader

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 3 pts · 136d

People who don’t know what words mean

NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 2 pts · 135d
erin@quokk.au · 1 pts · 135d
[ removed ]
Egonallanon@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 136d

I find drinking can get the particularly stupid creative juices flowing in ways other things can't when trying to create nonsense.