It ensures that the agent does a good job

Image Text:

Github overview of a pull request for the file AGENTS.md.

Comments regarding line "# Repository Guidelines" in the file:

zanieb: "What's the point of this title? Seems like wasted tokens?"

zanieb: "(certainly inconsequential in the big scheme, but I don't see it adding value)"

charliemarsh: "It ensures that the agent does a good job."

59 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 17 pts · 100d (1 reply)

I’m proud of the fact that I don’t understand this.

wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 100d

You and me both.

racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 100d (2 replies)

It wastes tokens which is good. Every penny my boss spends on AI brings the company closer to bankruptcy.

addie@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 100d (1 reply)

My company has just implemented a token leaderboard. I find that asking particularly insane questions burns more tokens, since it won't have previous results to fall back on.

racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 100d

Kind sir, could you share those questions? I'm in great need!

haverholm@kbin.earth · 4 pts · 100d (1 reply)

If the agent can't tell a contextual comment from an actionable code line, then it is indeed a wasted token. Not because of the header, but because of the "AI" being a useless POS.

Which, to be fair, is the case in pretty much all scenarios.

jj4211@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 100d

Wasn't a comment, it was a header in a markdown prompt for ai agents to slurp into their context.