There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
Safety Inspector Fired for Finding Too Many Defects Could Cost Railroad Millions
https://jalopnik.com/safety-inspector-fired-for-finding-too-many-defects-cou-1850817520
https://jalopnik.com/safety-inspector-fired-for-finding-too-many-defects-cou-1850817520
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
14 Comments
BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one · 31 pts · 3y
The railroad isn't selling itself as a very safe method of transportation these days.
Son_of_dad@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 3y
Seems almost intentional. Destroy the train system to feed the car industry
You999@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 3y
It is intentional but you have the wrong reason. Right now all of the class one railroads are trying a business strategy called precision schedule railroading in order to boost their stock prices. The meat and potatoes behind PSR is to lower the railroad's operation ratio as lower as possible by reducing anything that isn't absolutely critical to making the business run. That means cutting your staff to below a skeleton crew level while fighting the FRA to allow for one man crew trains, running extremely long trains even if it literally divides a community, and deferring maintenance unless uncle Sam wants to pitch in. In some extreme cases of PSR some railroads have even gone as far as closing down tracks in sections with multiple main lines.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 3y
How is this shit not illegal?
greenskye@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 3y
I feel like the car industry doesn't compete at all with cargo rail. You don't move tons of coal with a semi. That would be astronomically more expensive.
DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 3y
You should seek out the conspiracy community.
variants@possumpat.io · 1 pts · 3y
There's a good video on that I'll see if I can find it
Edit: https://youtu.be/qQTjLWIHN74?si=3ma1Z7oppJZw4ktO
NanoooK@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3y
Isn't it the safest?
Alexstarfire@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3y
No, that would be planes.
okamiueru@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y
Depends on the definition of safety. Though, it's not unreasonable to consider it as deaths/distance.
SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y
Planes would still be safer when considering deaths per distance. In 2020, trains had a death rate of 0.03 per 100,000,000 passenger miles, while planes had 0.00095 per 100,000,000 passenger miles.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/deaths-by-transportation-mode/
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 3y
All the rail companies are doing at this point is making the case for their shit to get nationalized stronger every single day. This is critical infrastructure, and they’re intentionally running it into the fucking ground.
Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 3y
Not the onion
baggins@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 3y
Sounds like Don Sanders is a hero.