c/me_irl · by hey@reddthat.com · 95dme_irl https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/8471b03a-a2b8-485e-8cc4-b9fba532fc60.mp4244 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world
10 Comments
ccunning@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 95d
It’s almost certain the $7 watch keeps far more accurate time…
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net · 16 pts · 95d
Expensive watches are for men who can’t admit they want to wear a bracelet.
ccunning@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 95d
…and folks who can admit it but also want that bracelet to be an unnecessarily complex Rube Goldberg machine of gears and springs…
UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe · 3 pts · 95d
Aren't those things, at least in part, a way to carry lots of wealth on you quite conveniently?
qualia@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 5d
Pocket watches were standard for men for just this readon until WWI when wristwatch convenience helped coordinate timing more efficiently.
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 94d
but skeleton watches are pretty neat
hey@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 94d
True
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 95d
John Mayer:
Yondoza@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 95d
Ootl, context?
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 95d
He is an avid watch collector.