RTO mandates then AI driven layoffs has been such an insulting slap in the face. We all knew both were bs, but the flagrant contradiction of "real work can only happen in person" to "sorry your job is now being done by a shitty LLM on the cloud" is just. Ugh.
99% of CEOs are the person most replaceable by AI in their company.
Would it cause the company to crash? Very likely. But if all the other employees remained they could possibly save it. More likely than the CEO trying to save the company when it's crashing from having replaced all the worker-bee people.
6 Comments
badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 121d
stoy@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 121d
That is just because they have too many employees and not enough AI.
/s
Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org · 22 pts · 120d
RTO mandates then AI driven layoffs has been such an insulting slap in the face. We all knew both were bs, but the flagrant contradiction of "real work can only happen in person" to "sorry your job is now being done by a shitty LLM on the cloud" is just. Ugh.
shirasho@feddit.online · 10 pts · 120d
I never even thought about this. Good callout.
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 120d
99% of CEOs are the person most replaceable by AI in their company.
Would it cause the company to crash? Very likely. But if all the other employees remained they could possibly save it. More likely than the CEO trying to save the company when it's crashing from having replaced all the worker-bee people.
Alien Invasion
hairyfeet@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 120d
It's always 2 years. Not so far to be fanciful but far enough to push it back every 6 months
MyFriendGodzilla@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 120d
These fucks get paid to say that tho.