eventually we will put cars on some kind of ground-based guiding track to help with autonomous navigation, which i guess will be simpler than using these video-recognizing chips. and we could also add some cables above the street sothat the cars can recharge while in movement.
There are so many people involved now we should probably find someone to blame when it goes wrong. That's it! That's the name. We should call it a Blame
7 Comments
gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org · 22 pts · 73d
eventually we will put cars on some kind of ground-based guiding track to help with autonomous navigation, which i guess will be simpler than using these video-recognizing chips. and we could also add some cables above the street sothat the cars can recharge while in movement.
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 72d
What if these cars could carry 20-30 people?
mushimas@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 72d
that would work, but who is going to repair the car when it needs maintenance? perhaps we can work out some kind of communal ownership?
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 72d
I suppose that'd be fine. But we've come so far away from the traditional car, we should probably come up with a new name for such a vehicle.
Crackhappy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 72d
There are so many people involved now we should probably find someone to blame when it goes wrong. That's it! That's the name. We should call it a Blame
bountygiver@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 72d
And then start chaining the cars that are going the same direction together so only 1 of them need to run the guiding system
mundane@piefed.world · 3 pts · 71d
Smart, that would also lower the drag on the chained vehicles.