Something that struck me about pictures of the Titanic, too. All the matched pairs of shoes with nothing else around. Treated leather can't be very digestable by sea life, at least in comparison to the rest of the bodily remains that would once have been there.
I did check lens as was suggested, and it comes up with a lot of hits but mostly to Pinterest and reddit as it's been reposted. I don't see anything factual without diving in further (no pun intended).
6 Comments
ace_garp@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 92d
Source anyone?
'TinEye searched over 84.3 billion images but didn't find any matches for your search image'
kalpol@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 92d
Had the wrong book and I can't delete my other comment yet. It is from David Mearns, Hood and Bismarck.
ace_garp@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 92d
Thanks for the provenance.
kalpol@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 92d
addie@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 92d
Something that struck me about pictures of the Titanic, too. All the matched pairs of shoes with nothing else around. Treated leather can't be very digestable by sea life, at least in comparison to the rest of the bodily remains that would once have been there.
q@piefed.social · 3 pts · 92d
I did check lens as was suggested, and it comes up with a lot of hits but mostly to Pinterest and reddit as it's been reposted. I don't see anything factual without diving in further (no pun intended).
I guess lens is better though.
UltraBlack@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 92d
Tineye sucks. Use https://lens.google.com/ Open it in desktop mode if you're on your phone