Paxton v. Talarico

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/43785843

OC

65 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

alapakala@quokk.au · 6 pts · 102d (6 replies)

Now I see what Uriel is crining about.
GL🫔 in your red statešŸ˜”.

uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 102d (5 replies)

I'm in California, which is purple with massive blue cities. But have been following the Paxton/Talarico race. Also the gerrymandering war and the Louisiana v. Callais aftermath.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 102d

im in cali too, we are likely getting Xavier as the govorner.

alapakala@quokk.au · 0 pts · 102d (3 replies)

Why the patriarch propaganda then?

family suffer
socialists win, or are you going to validate your masculinity?
supporting their families and their own interests,
communists, treasonous, and effeminate

uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 102d (2 replies)

Because that's a fair rendition of the kind of propaganda that is being used.

alapakala@quokk.au · 0 pts · 102d (1 reply)

Then you’ll continue prevailing patriarchal populists…

uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 101d

I hope not. I'm not making the propaganda up. But yes, we have a lot of single white men with conservative grievance and male insecurity, and this is the sort of rhetoric that is working on them to keep them loyal to the Republican party.

Maybe once they get hungry enough, or are sent as troops into Iran, their minds will change.