Perhaps most glaringly, the Financial Times‘ Richard Waters asks in a new piece, is whether SpaceX will be able to justify its unprecedented valuation five or ten years from now.
So the journalist of this article has nothing really and is carrying out some embarrassing shabby work.
Space X cannot justify it's valuation right now and this article does nothing to question that. Instead it's like a bunch of gossiping hairdressers all trying to guess who and when someone is going say the emperor has no clothes
8 Comments
SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml · 23 pts · 80d
It's run by an over-privileged junkie. I don't know how it got this far. Ooh yea, money. Lots and lots of money.
Not his money, OUR money.
unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 80d
Is US tax money really ours, or is it basically Trump's near-infinite gift fund?
SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 80d
I have thought long and hard about this but if Trump has not worked a day in his life then Trump doesn't know what money IS.
Everyone tells him he should get more but he doesn't know WHY. He's confused.
jh6AZStb@lemmy.ml · 20 pts · 80d
Inshallah
zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 80d
Yes please! But only as long as no astronauts get hurt.
Tangentism@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 80d
So the journalist of this article has nothing really and is carrying out some embarrassing shabby work.
Space X cannot justify it's valuation right now and this article does nothing to question that. Instead it's like a bunch of gossiping hairdressers all trying to guess who and when someone is going say the emperor has no clothes
pyramid20@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 80d
Please please please please
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 80d
At least more likely than reaching the valuation it would need for the IPO, if it wasn't solely based on hype.