[Eric Berger] A Falcon 9 booster turns 5 years old—and just set a remarkable reuse record

https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-falcon-9-booster-turns-five-years-old-and-just-set-a-remarkable-reuse-record/

24 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

ptfrd@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 77d (3 replies)

So in the time that this single Falcon 9 first stage has flown and landed 35 times, its competitor company [ULA] has made 29 total launches. Put another way, this rocket has put more mass into orbit than more than two dozen expendable rockets over half a decade of effort.

This paragraph feels like bullying :)

burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 76d

GOOD.

BastingChemina@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 76d

They could start buying second hand boosters from SpaceX

BastingChemina@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 76d
[ removed ]
shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 77d (2 replies)

It's really amazing. I remember when the goal for these things was to be able to launch and land 10 separate times before having to be scrapped and remade. And the fact that this thing has done 35 is quite frankly amazing.

Each time one of these things successfully lands, it just goes to prove that reusable rocket boosters are definitely possible and makes access to space just that little bit cheaper in the future.

I think it was said that if you had to have a new Boeing 747 for every single airplane flight that airplane flights would cost like half a million dollars per ticket and instead they cost like four to eight hundred dollars per ticket

burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 76d (1 reply)

Now we just need anyone else to do the same thing regularly to finally put some downward pricing pressure on SpaceX.

shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 76d

I completely agree. Clearly, they don't have very much downward pricing pressure because no one else is able to do it as frequently and they can clearly fill up their launch manifests every single time without much difficulty. So there's not much reason to lower the price farther.

The only thing that could lower prices right now would be a drop-off of demand at that price point or a competitor coming in with a lower price point.

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 77d

Long live B1067!

teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 75d

Musk might explode prematurely, but he is good at catching loads.