c/meanwhileongrad · by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 75d"Misinformation" for citing casualty numbers lol 48 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world
6 Comments
bss03@infosec.pub · 14 pts · 75d
I don't see a citation or any numbers in the removed comment. (I don't see any misinformation in it either, tho.)
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 75d
The idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.
bss03@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 74d
Thanks for the explanation!
pinto@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 59d
Lmao, PugJesus really banned you for being correct. World's biggest anti communist hates reality. Might as well sign up to join the Nazi party.
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 2 pts · 72d
Notice that europe@lemmy.ml is solely used to spread disparaging """news""" against the EU.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 72d
Jackeroni is also a particularly egregious tankie