LLMs are not thinking machines. They are word association probability engines. Most mentions of nukes would be in fiction...and the only reason to mention a nuke in fiction is for the nuke to be used or threatened to be used.
So, yeah. Maybe let's not rely on glorified autocorrect to handle our nuclear arsenals...
I think this YouTube short is a great example of how the AIs are not using reasoning or logic to draw conclusions.
https://youtube.com/shorts/bsl46vGpMNU
5 Comments
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 29 pts · 65d
LLMs are not thinking machines. They are word association probability engines. Most mentions of nukes would be in fiction...and the only reason to mention a nuke in fiction is for the nuke to be used or threatened to be used.
So, yeah. Maybe let's not rely on glorified autocorrect to handle our nuclear arsenals...
DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 65d
I think this YouTube short is a great example of how the AIs are not using reasoning or logic to draw conclusions. https://youtube.com/shorts/bsl46vGpMNU
taxon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 65d
https://youtube.com/shorts/bsl46vGpMNU
I sanitised the link for you by removing the tracking query. I'm sorry, it's a pet peeve.
DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 65d
I changed mine too. Thanks! It just didn't cross my mind at the time. I hate that tracking query as well!
trainsrkool@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 65d
I think there was a movie on this hehe