Supreme Court sides with a Texas man who says it’s not a crime for marijuana users to have guns
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-drugs-marijuana-texas-a60ce6df9e735c6bc7def285ca396784
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-drugs-marijuana-texas-a60ce6df9e735c6bc7def285ca396784
9 Comments
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 67d
That's a sensible ruling. No idea why MJ was ever singled out for such a thing in the first place.
It's just a holdover from the days of people queening out over a plant and buying into all the War on (Some) Drugs hysteria.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 23 pts · 67d
Because black people are more likely to toke and this is a great way to deny black people the right to own guns.
Carl@anarchist.nexus · 21 pts · 67d
This isn’t even sarcasm or a conspiracy theory. This was literally why the Feds started the war on drugs. There are records of officials talking about it, and they outright state that it was started because they wanted to criminalize historically black behaviors. Because they could then use that to target black communities.
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 67d
Yep, 100%. They also wanted to target liberals, too.
[emphasis mine]
https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/23/politics/john-ehrlichman-richard-nixon-drug-war-blacks-hippie
boelder@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 67d
100%
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 67d
That stuff isn't addictive anyways
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 22 pts · 67d
Idk man. I know it's not addictive for the average person, but I know some people that use once and then BAM! Their whole identity is about it. Shirts just covered in images of guns. They get a gun for their gun. They start carrying them around everywhere like a safety blanket. They play around with them like they are toys and do little quick draw motions.
It all seems pretty addictive behavior to me.
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 67d
I meant the weed not the guns lol.
artyom@piefed.social · 9 pts · 67d
thatsthejoke.jpg