I was looking at all the pics on the Londre page and laughing. Why couldn’t they do it at her pool? Someone in one shot has their baby with them on the boat
So glad to see her dark armpit trauma seems to have resolved. ;) This is all SUCH BS. They even beefed up her old tattoos to be punchier. And gave her a whole new neck. What a treat.
So little Miss Sarah sees herself as one of Canada’s most influential women and has decided to feature herself in a pay-to-play magazine while leading her followers to believe someone called her to arrange this cover story. This whole Influencer business just reeks! It really feels like she’s throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, at her ‘big career job’ hoping to stay relevant. Her fairy godmother is giving up the executive suite, packing up the family and travelling for a year so Sarah is frantically trying to keep her head above water.
Ahh yes, Iconic magazine... Is that a Condé Nast publication? I'm being sarcastic.
Another feature on how she's a warrior just for showing up. I secretly love all of this. She'll make a great character in a fiction novel. Uncredited, of course. 😏 & truthfully, she's really nothing without the fake hair.
I can’t find her making this comment anywhere on the post so I’m very confused by this search result! AI tells me it’s in Sarah’s caption but I don’t see it.
I told AI the comment is not in the caption and got this
A further search result it this one but the Substack is subscription only.i guess ‘organic choice’ means she didn’t pay?
She seems to have a limitless number and her loyal followers don’t seem to care they’re filtered. Her shoulder and chest in that 7th pic is a revelation and looks nothing like the one further down.
She’s pathetic. She really thinks highly of herself that she believes she’s one of the most influential woman on the Internet. What does she even DO????? She gets half naked and shows her body while pretending to love that body but filters it, that’s influential? What a world we live in that people fall for this crap.
i always think she’s reached peak cringe, and then she manages to out-do herself again and again. i gotta give it to her, she has absolutely NO shame (… pun intended)
I'm not surprised. Essity (the company that bought Knix) recently purchased OB Tampons, Platex and Carefree. Essity is dipping its toe into the traditional realm of feminine care as period panties are being deemed unsafe and WAY less absorbent than they claimed to be*.
*On the Essity website under feminine care, five types of products are listed before "leakproof apparel" .... "We offer a broad portfolio of pads, panty liners, tampons, intimate soaps and wipes...." It seems leakproof apparel isn't a priority for Essity anymore.
I wonder if Joanna Griffiths quit or was asked to leave Knix/Essity?
Something is up.
The New Jersey Health Department issued a warning about period panties, and more studies from multiple universities, including Harvard, are showing the dangers of PFAS (skin absorbability).
I wonder if Joanna is trying to slip away before an entire generation realizes she knowingly poisoned them.
It's amazing how many false claims Joanna Griffiths made about Knix being 100% PFAS-free. Sure, Joanna, just like your claims of "No photoshop or editing"... From class action lawsuits that Joanna Griffiths lost (regarding PFAS in Knix) to over 50 retouching files from Knix "no photoshop campaigns" being exposed, we know Joanna is a BIG FAT LIAR.
One interesting lie Joanna Griffiths made to cover up her "PFAS-free" lie was that "Knix contained only short-chain PFAS, which aren't dangerous." That's cute, Joanna. In 2024, the University of Birmingham released a massive study concluding that compounds like PFBS and PFPeA (short-chain) can penetrate skin at substantially higher absorption fractions than legacy long-chain chemicals like PFOA. In other words, short-chain PFAS absorb into our bodies within hours of wearing a garment. It was also noted that types of skin (thinner skin) are more permeable.
I guess Joanna is like Sarah and doesn't read the news.
I find it amusing that the University of Toronto is the school that discovered how period panties are the least absorbent and their absorbancy claims are wildly exaggerated. Of course, the NYTimes, Scientific American, and various USA-based and UK publications wrote about this. The Canadian media didn't touch it. Wouldn't want to upset the precious Joanna. She has more millions to make. More women to make sick or kill.
The joke of it all is that Joanna claimed Knix were more environmentally friendly, meanwhile anyone who uses them contaminates our water supply (thanks!).
Joanna claimed Knix are more affordable. With women needing 10-15 pairs, this is another lie.
I read about women asking for advice on cleaning their Knix. I've seen photos of them soaking in buckets, taking up the laundry room. Women on their knees scrubbing their period panties. Joanna's adverts and campaigns made these women think period panties are more moral, or that by wearing Knix you are a feminist.
Really? I do question those who bought into this. Have we lost our ability to think critically, or are we that naive?
Period panties aren't new. The same product was made in the 1910's and 20s. They were replaced by pads and tampons in the 1930's. Why? Because pads and tampons worked better and gave women more freedom. Joanna set women back. She remarketed an outdated product. She put us back on the "rag".
I guarantee girls are playing fewer sports because they are afraid of their leaking panties.
Last note: Since the USA cracked down on PFAS levels allowed in garments, many women are complaining about their period panties leaking or not working as well. Coincidence?
& why did Joanna Griffiths shutter all the California Knix stores? California is not poor. Their GDP is the 4th biggest in the world. Could it be that Governor Gavin Newsom's new PFAS restrictions would exclude Knix?
We will never know because Joanna Griffiths, like Sarah Nicole Landry, is a woman who supports women (lol); she is untouchable.
Good luck to the women out there who wear Knix.
*From the National Institute of Health NIH "Emerging research indicates that chronic exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can induce resistance to common chemotherapy drugs (like carboplatin, doxorubicin, and oxaliplatin) in cancers such as ovarian, colorectal, and pancreatic. PFAS chemicals achieve this by altering mitochondrial function, disrupting normal cell cycles, and reducing the effectiveness of treatments."
Joanna said, "It's no big deal; they (PFAS) are everywhere." YES, because of tools like you, lady. And not all PFAS are rubbing up against our thin-skinned privates for hours, days and weeks.
She knew she was lying when she made that PFAS-free claim but didn’t think she’d get outed. It will be interesting if this turns into another talc-like claim in the years to come.
Haven't been on Lemmy for a while, so late to reply! Thank you for this comment! This is SO interesting. I have Endo and Adeno, so bled incredibly heavily before I was put on meds. I used period undies (particularly Knix because they weren't too tight on my sore belly like other brands) so this hits hard! And funnily enough, I actually found them not through an influencer, but on recommendation from a friend. And then recommended them to other friends, before I heard about the PFAS scandal. I switched to a disc pre-covid, and never looked back. The amount of women who these asshats have potentially hurt.... Fuck them.
I would love to know how many hours she’s spent in front of a mirror gazing at herself in her phone. Children learn by example and the one she’s setting is deplorable.
The photo on the right was two weeks ago, and the photo on the left is from today. Posted standing in the same position in the same mirror wearing the same earrings. Anyone who thinks Sarah Nicole does not use filters is out to lunch. She looks like too completely different people here- different sized eyes, nose, forehead, cheekbones, jawline. And neither of them are what she looks like IRL.
This! Her face and body change with her emotions. Think of her stupid, smug face when she unboxes a freebie. Her slutty dolphin face when she's feeling extra insecure. Her little 14-year-old girl face with a button nose when she's alone and high as a kite.
The photo on the right is hilarious! If you happened to see that photo somewhere without any context or any mention of her, there is not a chance in a million years you would ever guess who it was.
I think this is an important comment made on Reddit. Would this be marketed as “The Penis Pocket”? I don’t think any of the women behind the Londre suit would be celebrating its release. I can’t figure out if they think they’re being subversive with this launch or just looking for the spotlight.
sincerely embarrassed for everyone involved. this is so wack and uncool lmao. sucks to be affiliated with bird in any capacity, but this is an especially embarrassing one.
Also…..a few weeks ago the “artist” posted, asking for ideas of something to make. 🐤suggested a sparkly vulva. Flash forward to this launch. Its all a set up, all the time.
Always. Birdie probably paid for her comment to be liked. They are all fake. The artist looks very different in person; think ridden hard and put away wet.
it’s insulting to the intelligence of their customers to claim that they don’t use filters. the face they gave bird on the banner pic of their website looks NOTHING like her.
Her kids know every big open gaping mouth laugh is fake. She does it in every pic. She’s stuck in the 2016 influencer era of big laugh, coyly looking down at pigeon toed shoes, or holding a cup of coffee.
your archive of receipts is incredible!! the most extreme examples of sarah's lies/deception/exploitation happen on her stories, which disappear after 24 hr. it satisfies my sense of justice and truth to know that somewhere out there, receipts of her horrible behaviour exist.
Terrified people will see the “real” her. “There’s so many cameras!”
Meanwhile she posts her family, people in the background, other people’s children without a second thought. But then again she thinks consent is annoying and just wants people to do what she wants them to do.
The Birds Papaya, Sarah Nicole Landry's sister Meghann Dykstra (@ourcountryacres on Instagram), reposted and highlighted a social media post that can be seen as transphobic. This repost and highlight were posted on @ourcountryacres' Instagram account around January 30th, 2026.
The post states, "If a trans person goes Missing... do we put their Picture on a carton of Half and half or... 🙄😂"
TheBirdsPapaya's sister, Meghann Dykstra @ourcountryacres, is listed as the parent on a bullying-prevention plan PDF. The school is the Kenilworth Public School, part of the Upper Grand District School Board.
The Upper Grand District School Board and the Kenilworth Public School receive core education funding that comes directly from the provincial government, which is supported by general provincial tax revenues and education property taxes. If you live in Ontario, you pay these taxes.
Meghann Dykstra is listed as the parent on the Safe Schools Committee. She is listed as an Emergency Supply Teacher (OCT-certified) at Kenilworth Public School.
Meghann Dykstra's role on the Safe Schools Committee makes me concerned about students attending this school. Meghann Dykstra willingly shared and highlighted a social media post about missing trans people. The post, to me, appears to mock trans people and dehumanize trans people.
In my opinion, a parent on the Kenilworth Public School Safe Schools Committee who highlights the view point expressed in this exact social media post may not provide due diligence for a trans student who is being bullied or a student who speaks up for trans rights. This is my personal opinion and doesn't reflect this group or Lemmy.ca
In my opinion, the post dehumanizes trans people. Dehumanizing trans people puts their lives at risk.
Meghann saved the post to her "highlights" on Instagram. There were only two posts in her highlights.
Meghann removed the transphobic post when a Redditor posted it two days ago.
This illustrates to me that Meghann sees the transphobic post as top-tier content that deserves to be highlighted. This is my opinion.
From PDF School Bullying Prevention and Equity & Inclusive Goal(s):
Encourage activities that promote and empower student voice.
Embed instructional practice that includes equity and inclusivity on a daily basis.
Encourage an environment that appreciates differences.
Bring awareness to the power of one person to make a difference in a bullying situation.
Build knowledge and understanding about different cultures
Under Canadian law, public engagement and criticism of public institutions, including school boards, trustees, teachers, and school councils/committees, are legally protected and actively encouraged. I have a legal right to expression. Charter Protections: Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. Public Institutions: School boards (including the Upper Grand District School Board) are publicly funded public bodies. Citizens have the right to question, critique, and comment on their policies, staff actions, and safety programs. I have shared opinions, critiques, and statements of fact.
She’s on the Safe Schools Committee??! The school/school board is obviously not aware of her posts/reposts on sm! I hope they will take appropriate action to remove this type of person from any committees she might be on.
87 Comments
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 48d
This is posted on the Guelph subreddit. It’s from a public account so I didn’t block out any names
Adavison@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 47d
What’s the grey emoji she used
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 47d
I think it’s a camcorder
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 47d
That makes sense
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 47d
I couldn’t figure it out either!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 48d
This whole bathing suit launch is hilarious!
Poofluencers@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 48d
It’s giving:
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 48d
I was looking at all the pics on the Londre page and laughing. Why couldn’t they do it at her pool? Someone in one shot has their baby with them on the boat
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 48d
The shitty photo editing is killing me. 😂 This is next level.
BirdsaLiar@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 48d
Filtered right down to the hair. We know it’s fried and that’s not her hairline. What frauds.
cookiefleck@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 47d
So glad to see her dark armpit trauma seems to have resolved. ;) This is all SUCH BS. They even beefed up her old tattoos to be punchier. And gave her a whole new neck. What a treat.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 48d
This is another company that says it doesn’t edit. This was right from the camera! They are so full of shit!
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 48d
Yet on KB podcast birdshit looks like a 45 yr old should
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 48d
That’s just how you received it! 😝
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 47d
Right? It’s giving the cool not regular moms all set up for a play date together bc no one else likes us and we’re gonna pretend we’re a big deal😵💫
No_really_why@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 48d
I honestly thought that was just her immature joke about it. How the hell she convinced an actual company this was a good idea is beyond me.
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 48d
Poor 🐦 should have C at her side
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 48d
The location tag is not it!
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 48d
Is that her phone on in her belly? Her bikini is so small her phone covers it.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 41d
So little Miss Sarah sees herself as one of Canada’s most influential women and has decided to feature herself in a pay-to-play magazine while leading her followers to believe someone called her to arrange this cover story. This whole Influencer business just reeks! It really feels like she’s throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, at her ‘big career job’ hoping to stay relevant. Her fairy godmother is giving up the executive suite, packing up the family and travelling for a year so Sarah is frantically trying to keep her head above water.
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 41d
Who else has been on the cover and how many are with Shine? She gave 💵 to do this, so weird to act like it’s something she was chosen for 😵💫
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 41d
Ahh yes, Iconic magazine... Is that a Condé Nast publication? I'm being sarcastic. Another feature on how she's a warrior just for showing up. I secretly love all of this. She'll make a great character in a fiction novel. Uncredited, of course. 😏 & truthfully, she's really nothing without the fake hair.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 40d
I asked Google if she paid for this cover and this is what I got.
Did anyone hear her say that she was offered a different cover but it was paid so she did Iconic?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 40d
Where is this from? I'm reading the comments on her post.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 40d
I can’t find her making this comment anywhere on the post so I’m very confused by this search result! AI tells me it’s in Sarah’s caption but I don’t see it.
I told AI the comment is not in the caption and got this
A further search result it this one but the Substack is subscription only.i guess ‘organic choice’ means she didn’t pay?
I like this comment -
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 39d
I have a question. How many faces and noses can one person have in a day?
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 39d
She seems to have a limitless number and her loyal followers don’t seem to care they’re filtered. Her shoulder and chest in that 7th pic is a revelation and looks nothing like the one further down.
curious_walriss_888@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 35d
I've been thinking about this.... Did she ACTUALLY sign off on this nose?! Because if so, who is she trying to be this week?!
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 40d
The comment you like is great! I still think Sarah paid. There is no way they would give her this. Everyone else has paid.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 39d
It feels like another SI moment where it’s obvious she paid but she will deny it until her dying day!
No_really_why@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 39d
This is my issue with AI. it’s never accurate, just pretends to be.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 39d
Ew, imagine if a dude wrote this? She'd be all over it (while secretly loving it).
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 40d
wtf at this comment
crownofgold6@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 41d
She’s pathetic. She really thinks highly of herself that she believes she’s one of the most influential woman on the Internet. What does she even DO????? She gets half naked and shows her body while pretending to love that body but filters it, that’s influential? What a world we live in that people fall for this crap.
mapper@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 41d
i always think she’s reached peak cringe, and then she manages to out-do herself again and again. i gotta give it to her, she has absolutely NO shame (… pun intended)
Frequent_staff@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 40d
I want her to hit the level of cringe that gets her permanently cancelled. I think it’s coming.
mapper@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 40d
🤞 we can hope!
Lisamarie@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 39d
I sure hope so!!
hereforthetea@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 41d
Wait what lol who’s traveling for a year?
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 41d
Queen Panties announced she’s quit Knix and is taking the family for a trip of a lifetime - it begins in Kenya
hereforthetea@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 41d
Oh I must of missed that..
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 41d
I'm not surprised. Essity (the company that bought Knix) recently purchased OB Tampons, Platex and Carefree. Essity is dipping its toe into the traditional realm of feminine care as period panties are being deemed unsafe and WAY less absorbent than they claimed to be*.
*On the Essity website under feminine care, five types of products are listed before "leakproof apparel" .... "We offer a broad portfolio of pads, panty liners, tampons, intimate soaps and wipes...." It seems leakproof apparel isn't a priority for Essity anymore.
I wonder if Joanna Griffiths quit or was asked to leave Knix/Essity?
Something is up.
The New Jersey Health Department issued a warning about period panties, and more studies from multiple universities, including Harvard, are showing the dangers of PFAS (skin absorbability).
I wonder if Joanna is trying to slip away before an entire generation realizes she knowingly poisoned them.
It's amazing how many false claims Joanna Griffiths made about Knix being 100% PFAS-free. Sure, Joanna, just like your claims of "No photoshop or editing"... From class action lawsuits that Joanna Griffiths lost (regarding PFAS in Knix) to over 50 retouching files from Knix "no photoshop campaigns" being exposed, we know Joanna is a BIG FAT LIAR.
One interesting lie Joanna Griffiths made to cover up her "PFAS-free" lie was that "Knix contained only short-chain PFAS, which aren't dangerous." That's cute, Joanna. In 2024, the University of Birmingham released a massive study concluding that compounds like PFBS and PFPeA (short-chain) can penetrate skin at substantially higher absorption fractions than legacy long-chain chemicals like PFOA. In other words, short-chain PFAS absorb into our bodies within hours of wearing a garment. It was also noted that types of skin (thinner skin) are more permeable.
I guess Joanna is like Sarah and doesn't read the news.
I find it amusing that the University of Toronto is the school that discovered how period panties are the least absorbent and their absorbancy claims are wildly exaggerated. Of course, the NYTimes, Scientific American, and various USA-based and UK publications wrote about this. The Canadian media didn't touch it. Wouldn't want to upset the precious Joanna. She has more millions to make. More women to make sick or kill.
The joke of it all is that Joanna claimed Knix were more environmentally friendly, meanwhile anyone who uses them contaminates our water supply (thanks!).
Joanna claimed Knix are more affordable. With women needing 10-15 pairs, this is another lie.
I read about women asking for advice on cleaning their Knix. I've seen photos of them soaking in buckets, taking up the laundry room. Women on their knees scrubbing their period panties. Joanna's adverts and campaigns made these women think period panties are more moral, or that by wearing Knix you are a feminist.
Really? I do question those who bought into this. Have we lost our ability to think critically, or are we that naive?
Period panties aren't new. The same product was made in the 1910's and 20s. They were replaced by pads and tampons in the 1930's. Why? Because pads and tampons worked better and gave women more freedom. Joanna set women back. She remarketed an outdated product. She put us back on the "rag".
I guarantee girls are playing fewer sports because they are afraid of their leaking panties.
Last note: Since the USA cracked down on PFAS levels allowed in garments, many women are complaining about their period panties leaking or not working as well. Coincidence?
& why did Joanna Griffiths shutter all the California Knix stores? California is not poor. Their GDP is the 4th biggest in the world. Could it be that Governor Gavin Newsom's new PFAS restrictions would exclude Knix?
We will never know because Joanna Griffiths, like Sarah Nicole Landry, is a woman who supports women (lol); she is untouchable.
Good luck to the women out there who wear Knix.
*From the National Institute of Health NIH "Emerging research indicates that chronic exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can induce resistance to common chemotherapy drugs (like carboplatin, doxorubicin, and oxaliplatin) in cancers such as ovarian, colorectal, and pancreatic. PFAS chemicals achieve this by altering mitochondrial function, disrupting normal cell cycles, and reducing the effectiveness of treatments."
Joanna said, "It's no big deal; they (PFAS) are everywhere." YES, because of tools like you, lady. And not all PFAS are rubbing up against our thin-skinned privates for hours, days and weeks.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 40d
She knew she was lying when she made that PFAS-free claim but didn’t think she’d get outed. It will be interesting if this turns into another talc-like claim in the years to come.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 40d
Exactly, it's really pathetic that she lied and doubled down. All because she can't be wrong.
curious_walriss_888@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 35d
Haven't been on Lemmy for a while, so late to reply! Thank you for this comment! This is SO interesting. I have Endo and Adeno, so bled incredibly heavily before I was put on meds. I used period undies (particularly Knix because they weren't too tight on my sore belly like other brands) so this hits hard! And funnily enough, I actually found them not through an influencer, but on recommendation from a friend. And then recommended them to other friends, before I heard about the PFAS scandal. I switched to a disc pre-covid, and never looked back. The amount of women who these asshats have potentially hurt.... Fuck them.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 42d
I would love to know how many hours she’s spent in front of a mirror gazing at herself in her phone. Children learn by example and the one she’s setting is deplorable.
Glowpop@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 42d
I can't believe she's still trying to make those glasses work for herself
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 44d
New face. I really can’t stand her need to call every object a She or Her
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 43d
I can't stand her faces, all 1000 of them. It's nice to see that her Londre collab flopped.
Lisamarie@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 44d
I find it so annoying when she does that! Trying to play a teenager…🙄😒
Honey_Lemon1105@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 45d
The photo on the right was two weeks ago, and the photo on the left is from today. Posted standing in the same position in the same mirror wearing the same earrings. Anyone who thinks Sarah Nicole does not use filters is out to lunch. She looks like too completely different people here- different sized eyes, nose, forehead, cheekbones, jawline. And neither of them are what she looks like IRL.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 45d
This is such a perfect example of how she manipulates her image to suit her mood!
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 44d
This! Her face and body change with her emotions. Think of her stupid, smug face when she unboxes a freebie. Her slutty dolphin face when she's feeling extra insecure. Her little 14-year-old girl face with a button nose when she's alone and high as a kite.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 42d
The photo on the right is hilarious! If you happened to see that photo somewhere without any context or any mention of her, there is not a chance in a million years you would ever guess who it was.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 48d
I think this is an important comment made on Reddit. Would this be marketed as “The Penis Pocket”? I don’t think any of the women behind the Londre suit would be celebrating its release. I can’t figure out if they think they’re being subversive with this launch or just looking for the spotlight.
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 48d
Frequent_staff@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 47d
So much diversity…
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 48d
Classy!
mapper@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 44d
sincerely embarrassed for everyone involved. this is so wack and uncool lmao. sucks to be affiliated with bird in any capacity, but this is an especially embarrassing one.
HippoBloat@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 43d
Also…..a few weeks ago the “artist” posted, asking for ideas of something to make. 🐤suggested a sparkly vulva. Flash forward to this launch. Its all a set up, all the time.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 43d
Always. Birdie probably paid for her comment to be liked. They are all fake. The artist looks very different in person; think ridden hard and put away wet.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 43d
☺️🥴😂
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 39d
Gosh, makeup really changes her appearance.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 39d
She must wear incredibly powerful makeup!
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 43d
The fake ass yawn in her latest reel 😆
GumboYaYa@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 42d
Tired of her own bullshit!
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 42d
☝️👍🤡😂☠️
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 42d
That was such an unnecessary reel but it was time for another underwear show in the bathroom. She’s just so incredibly boring!
FraudulentFruit1@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 43d
JFC she’s such a clown
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 41d
Glitchy, glitchy AI filter.
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 41d
So they shoot with an AI filter and pretend the images haven’t been altered? I’m not surprised.
mapper@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 41d
it’s insulting to the intelligence of their customers to claim that they don’t use filters. the face they gave bird on the banner pic of their website looks NOTHING like her.
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 41d
Her kids know every big open gaping mouth laugh is fake. She does it in every pic. She’s stuck in the 2016 influencer era of big laugh, coyly looking down at pigeon toed shoes, or holding a cup of coffee.
Here’s the clip: https://imgur.com/a/ORgt43m
PearlyWisdom420@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 41d
“This is why we leave the cooking to Shane or Ubereats”… hmmm I wonder how she’s eating these days?
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 41d
Ick. Clips like this really tell me her following is fake. Who cares about this? No one.
Selfabsorbedbarbie@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 41d
It's all just so cringe
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 41d
Ew, what a knob.
mapper@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 41d
your archive of receipts is incredible!! the most extreme examples of sarah's lies/deception/exploitation happen on her stories, which disappear after 24 hr. it satisfies my sense of justice and truth to know that somewhere out there, receipts of her horrible behaviour exist.
Rarepotato@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 39d
Terrified people will see the “real” her. “There’s so many cameras!”
Meanwhile she posts her family, people in the background, other people’s children without a second thought. But then again she thinks consent is annoying and just wants people to do what she wants them to do.
https://imgur.com/a/Pf0m37R
Scared to walk into a store in case anyone sees the real her.
https://imgur.com/a/2FfjHh2
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 39d
Such trepidation as she walks into the store!! She's a liar, and she knows it.
Can you imagine filtering yourself into a supermodel? Meanwhile, without filters, you look pretty much the same as you did when you hated yourself.
Right-side image from June 2026
Right-side image from May 2023
How on earth did she get away with this? How did people believe a person's face could change so dramatically with weight loss, lenses and angles?
SUPERMODEL selfie during lockdowns.
Renee Reina Grenon's sister-in-law needs to come clean about making that video to defend Sarah Nicole Landry's lies and obvious use of filters.
Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 50d
Is this her transphobic sister at the queer hockey event? I can't tell!!a
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 49d
The Birds Papaya, Sarah Nicole Landry's sister Meghann Dykstra (@ourcountryacres on Instagram), reposted and highlighted a social media post that can be seen as transphobic. This repost and highlight were posted on @ourcountryacres' Instagram account around January 30th, 2026.
The post states, "If a trans person goes Missing... do we put their Picture on a carton of Half and half or... 🙄😂"
TheBirdsPapaya's sister, Meghann Dykstra @ourcountryacres, is listed as the parent on a bullying-prevention plan PDF. The school is the Kenilworth Public School, part of the Upper Grand District School Board.
The Upper Grand District School Board and the Kenilworth Public School receive core education funding that comes directly from the provincial government, which is supported by general provincial tax revenues and education property taxes. If you live in Ontario, you pay these taxes.
Meghann Dykstra is listed as the parent on the Safe Schools Committee. She is listed as an Emergency Supply Teacher (OCT-certified) at Kenilworth Public School.
Meghann Dykstra's role on the Safe Schools Committee makes me concerned about students attending this school. Meghann Dykstra willingly shared and highlighted a social media post about missing trans people. The post, to me, appears to mock trans people and dehumanize trans people.
In my opinion, a parent on the Kenilworth Public School Safe Schools Committee who highlights the view point expressed in this exact social media post may not provide due diligence for a trans student who is being bullied or a student who speaks up for trans rights. This is my personal opinion and doesn't reflect this group or Lemmy.ca
In my opinion, the post dehumanizes trans people. Dehumanizing trans people puts their lives at risk.
Meghann saved the post to her "highlights" on Instagram. There were only two posts in her highlights.
Meghann removed the transphobic post when a Redditor posted it two days ago.
This illustrates to me that Meghann sees the transphobic post as top-tier content that deserves to be highlighted. This is my opinion.
From PDF School Bullying Prevention and Equity & Inclusive Goal(s):
Under Canadian law, public engagement and criticism of public institutions, including school boards, trustees, teachers, and school councils/committees, are legally protected and actively encouraged. I have a legal right to expression. Charter Protections: Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. Public Institutions: School boards (including the Upper Grand District School Board) are publicly funded public bodies. Citizens have the right to question, critique, and comment on their policies, staff actions, and safety programs. I have shared opinions, critiques, and statements of fact.
ThatOrangeBird@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 49d
I see she writes exactly like her sister.
Lisamarie@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 49d
She’s on the Safe Schools Committee??! The school/school board is obviously not aware of her posts/reposts on sm! I hope they will take appropriate action to remove this type of person from any committees she might be on.
facialSwelling@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 49d
I agree.
ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 47d
I’m not surprised she’d post this but I’ve definitely accidentally reshared stuff before lol. I check every week or so to delete stuff!
MoonChild@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 50d
I saw that post and zoomed in on the woman’s shoes. I don’t think it’s the sister’s style. The woman does look a lot like her.