The upgrade has arrived

129 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz · 26 pts · 38d (7 replies)

I feel like the other way around would work better

PugJesus@piefed.social · 31 pts · 38d

Interestingly enough, the English longbow was a fairly late adoption!

Previous self-bows did not have the range or penetrative power of the English longbow, and even in England itself, the crossbow was more common until the mid-14th century AD. The longbow, thus, was introduced as an 'upgrade' of sorts to the well-established crossbow!

davidagain@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 38d (5 replies)

If you had no skill or strength, a crossbow was better, but people with good skill and strength can fire lots and lots of arrows in the same time as two crossbow arrows and more accurately.

CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 38d (4 replies)

Which is why crossbows were better. An hour with a thousand farmers and you've got an army.

Takes years of practice and strength training to handle an English longbow.

Noite_Etion@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 38d (1 reply)

Every boy in England was required to learn how to use a longbow, there were no farmers in England that needed to be rapidly trained. It was also a requirement that all men from 15-60 own and use a longbow (practice every week).

It was enforced for like 500 years.

Grail@multiverse.soulism.net · 7 pts · 38d

America: You have the right to bear arms

England: I better see you bearing arms or you're in trouble

davidagain@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 38d

The longbow was the upgrade. Better in battle.

When I was a boy, I had a little casio musical keyboard. With no training whatsoever, I could press a button and piano music would play. A real piano would be an upgrade.

justaman123@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d

They were like the fighter pilots of their day

wieson@feddit.org · 2 pts · 38d

In the floor above them, looking through a giant glass window onto the landscape, no discussion audible: the compound bow.