I'm not sure this would actually work? Is there anything wrong with it? I think it would only work somewhere that doesn't experience cold winters. The idea that it uses things that are already highly available in a very efficient synergistic combination.

4 Comments
badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 80d
On a surface look, probably it works. Maybe things like nitrate/phosphate balance or pest/microbe control impact the long term production.
The problem, as with all CCS strategies is: how do you pay for it? Maybe you can sell those products for a rate that covers the labour and wear and upkeep of the system? It might just be more cost effective to take the carbon-free energy and use it to displace fossil fuel consumption...
jaykrown@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 80d
Excess energy sale, biochar, animal feed, fertilizer sales. Along with carbon capture credits if somewhere that pays for that.
jaykrown@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 80d
Oh I also forgot, technically you could probably raise fish in the pond as well, but I don't know if they'd eat all the azolla. The point also is to keep the pond shallow, less than 10 cm, to make it easier to construct, harvest, and manage.
jaykrown@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 80d
Master Plan: Agrivoltaic Azolla Cultivation (Simplified)
A practical, low-cost system that uses solar panels and floating water ferns (Azolla) to capture carbon and generate profitable products.
The 4-Step System Loop
1) Shallow Clay Ponds
2) Solar Panel Canopy (Agrivoltaics)
3) Automated Squeeze Loop
4) Solar Drying & Final Products
Estimated Yearly Yields (Per 1 Hectare Pilot)