Torum : host a forum in your pocket. [AIP]

Torum is a self-hosted, Tor-native discussion forum modeled after Hacker News. It runs entirely as a Tor hidden service, accessible only through the Tor network via a .onion address. All data is stored locally in an SQLite database, and the entire application is managed through a single interactive shell script. Designed for operators who want to run a private or semi-private community forum with no reliance on clearnet infrastructure, third-party services, or cloud hosting.

32 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus MOD · 9 pts · 55d (10 replies)

@hereforawhile@lemmy.ml can you please update with the appropriate tag per rules 7/8? And if it is AI-assisted development, rule 8 link details the disclosures.

Let me know if you have any questions

hereforawhile@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 55d (9 replies)

Yes, sorry haven't been here in awhile sorry.

This project was created with AI assistance.

[Me] Design - architecture, system design

[Ai] Implementation - production code

[Me] Testing - I've been testing live for a few weeks on various platforms for reliability and performance Bug hunting / feature tweaks.

[Ai - proofread and adjusted for accuracy by Me] Documentation - Docs, comments, README, change logs.

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus · 7 pts · 55d (7 replies)

No worries, its a new rule following a slew of posts from brand new users promo'ing fully generated projects (and a pretty hefty community response as a result)

Thanks!

skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 55d (5 replies)

@curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

The OP's disclosure doesn't meet the requirements you laid out for proper disclosure. At this early stage I would suggest removing posts that only partially meet the criteria, otherwise you will spend a lot of time handholding posters. Or, if low quality disclosures are allowed, then it dilutes the effect of the rules immensely. I know you want to be patient with people, but proper enforcement now will pay off in the long run!

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus · 3 pts · 55d

Unfortunately I was replying from my phone and didn't notice. And yes, definitely trying to be patient given its a new rule and not exactly the easiest.

The up side is these are the sort of things that come up that make it easier to identify the holes - particularly the lack of examples. I'll clear that up later today after I'm done with work.

hereforawhile@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 55d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus · 2 pts · 55d (1 reply)

The part that isn't right (and sorry, was replying from my phone earlier so I didn't notice) is the level of AI involvement.

So lets say the only AI assisted part was documentation, and it was fully generated - you'd put:

  • Documentation: Generated

If you also had it suggest testing, but you implemented the tests themselves, that would be Hint, so it would look like this:

  • Testing: Hint
  • Documentation: Generated

I think I should put a few examples in the post to make it clearer

hereforawhile@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 55d

Yes, a copy paste template would be really nice and may make it easier to interpret. An example of a acceptable disclosure of what everyone wants to see.

hereforawhile@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 55d

Declare what aspect of the project used AI. You only need to provide the categories where AI was used:

Then state the level of AI involvement for each category listed:

@skyline2 what are you looking for the disclosure looks fulfilled to me?

skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 55d
[ removed ]
Archer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 55d

These are not tags as specified in the rules

biotin7@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 54d

I'll take a look.

hereforawhile@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 55d

Find here

ambermaple11347@lemmy.1095.me · -6 pts · 55d
[ removed ]