I had never heard of an "art detective" before today, but that's the coolest job title I've ever heard. It sounds very Indiana Jones-ey. (And yes, I understand it's probably a lot of desk work)
According to his Wikipedia page he actually earns his living as an art historian and art consultant. Recovering lost and stolen art is just a hobby... And that's definitely pretty Indiana Jones-esque.
This kind of headline makes me sick: "Work of art worth X currency" - because of course it's only the financial speculative aspect that makes art valuable and no one cares about anything else. Disgusting.
Realistically? I think it very much is. If you can't make money with art either by producing or buying/selling/owning it then pretty much no one cares.
When is the last time you genuinely saw someone care about a work of art breaking new ground, or for it delving into truly novel understanding, or due to it invoking feelings in the recipient?
Like the outrage ober the self-shredding Banksy? Oh noes, so much value destroyed how could he!!1
Honestly I really hope he stole it back but changed the story. Fuck art dealers and thieves.
I just reat the article... I still hope someone stole it back and presented r compelling story to the cops about making them look quite good with the story. I know that very unlikely to be what happened but I STILL WANT IT TO BE CANON 😭
13 Comments
Jables@iusearchlinux.fyi · 24 pts · 2y
I had never heard of an "art detective" before today, but that's the coolest job title I've ever heard. It sounds very Indiana Jones-ey. (And yes, I understand it's probably a lot of desk work)
ZeroCool@feddit.ch · 28 pts · 2y
According to his Wikipedia page he actually earns his living as an art historian and art consultant. Recovering lost and stolen art is just a hobby... And that's definitely pretty Indiana Jones-esque.
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 2y
The Art Detectives series is good. Not crime related, but interesting investigations of paintings
https://imdb.com/title/tt8460774/plotsummary/?ref_=tt_ov_pl
cthonctic@kbin.social · 13 pts · 2y
This kind of headline makes me sick: "Work of art worth X currency" - because of course it's only the financial speculative aspect that makes art valuable and no one cares about anything else. Disgusting.
EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Is it though?
cthonctic@kbin.social · 4 pts · 2y
Realistically? I think it very much is. If you can't make money with art either by producing or buying/selling/owning it then pretty much no one cares.
When is the last time you genuinely saw someone care about a work of art breaking new ground, or for it delving into truly novel understanding, or due to it invoking feelings in the recipient?
Like the outrage ober the self-shredding Banksy? Oh noes, so much value destroyed how could he!!1
bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
Graffiti?
The Grenfell tower fire tributes weren't produced for money, and invoke feelings
https://ldngraffiti.co.uk/graffiti
cthonctic@kbin.social · 1 pts · 2y
Yep, that counts. And honestly, it counts for a lot more to me than speculative art trading and hoarding.
altima_neo@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 2y
I mean, original Van Gogh gigs will sell for boatloads of money though. It's not particularly speculative.
Lesser known artists, sure.
MetaRobert@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y
I hope he got it laminated before he started handling it.
Zehzin@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y
Art Detective Raphaël Ambrosius Costeau
3laws@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
Honestly I really hope he stole it back but changed the story. Fuck art dealers and thieves.
jerome@kbin.social · 2 pts · 2y
Thanks.