A schoolyard tip for fighting tariff bullying

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/gift/648d866926019f7ec097ab9d60f6cc089afc1019381678b535266be96e5a9339/MLVCICEQ5ZEWDEC62RVNQAPOKQ/

For example, the decision of most provinces to remove U.S. wine, beer and spirits from store shelves is a major irritant south of the border. A California senator recently pleaded with Canadians to reconsider and a New York state representative threatened retaliation over the bans. Why would Canadians reverse such a tactic without getting something real in return? And something real has to mean more than just a rollback to the tariff policy of last week. Similarly, giving up Canadian tariffs on U.S. vehicles – imposed in response to American tariffs on our own exports – in return for nothing would be surrender, not negotiation

26 points · 3 comments · view on lemmy.world

3 Comments

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 23d

If only america had some serious negotiators who understand the concept of give and take. You can't just say the words "I'm a great negotiator", there has to be some substance beneath it all.

gramie@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 23d

Vehicles are much more complicated than alcohol, though. There are assembly plants and parts suppliers on both sides of the border, and there is a transfer back and forth about six times in the production of a single vehicle. There is no way that Canada could simply ban American vehicles without jeopardizing our parts manufacturers as well.

Nagrom@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 23d

I’m ready to cut of my nose…