Re: https://discuss

https://discuss.systems/@ricci/116961677110890384

Re: https://discuss.systems/@ricci/116961677110890384I've taken part in numerous computer science research projects that involved IRB review. I believe the system work, even for cases like the above post. But Google and Stanford are bad actors that are taken at their word, and no system, IRB based or otherwise, is going to function properly if it cannot appropriately metabolize this reality.I was once in a meeting where a Google X person gushed about a project that used smartphone sensor data to detect earthquakes. The calculus being set up here is that detecting earthquakes is a social good that outweighs any particular individual's right to privacy and even outweighs their right to know that their smartphone is being used in this way, let alone consent to it in any meaningful way. () Let me be clear and say I reject this framing, but it does appeal to a lot of people, even well-meaning ones. A mess.#Google #IRB #ethics #EthicsReview #ComputerScience #research #ResearchEthics #tech #dev() I assume there's some contortion involving EULAs whereby Google X can pretend that anyone using Android consented to having their smartphone's sensor data used for any future purpose Google et al. cooks up.

1 points · 0 comments · view on lemmy.world

0 Comments

No comments yet.