Thoughts on "Open" Models: The debate focuses on balancing open and closed models, with cost and geopolitical considerations influencing the push for open weight AI.
https://spyglass.org/open-weight-ai-models/
36 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world
6 Comments
eicker@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 19d
Funny how »open is dangerous« only became the dominant narrative once Chinese models caught up: If your competitive moat depends on governments blocking free alternatives instead of building better products, maybe your moat isn’t technology at all.
realityisascammer@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 19d
This is so blatantly obvious, for anyone paying attencion, that just goes to show how ignorant/naive most people are
eicker@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 19d
Ever since facts have been replaced by ideologies, the obvious has increasingly become a mystery.
zwerg@feddit.org · 5 pts · 19d
I don't about your business, but we've had LOT of conversations about how much we trust these models. Not just about data egress, but on what they are trained to do/not to do - Chinese or not.
eicker@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 19d
Absolutely. Trust isn’t binary, and it isn’t unique to Chinese models either. Every (frontier) model reflects the incentives, values and constraints of whoever built it. That’s exactly why competition matters.
BrickEater@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 18d
Just delete it all.