A missing line of code meant "share with a link" and "searchable by anyone" were the same thing—and someone already saved 11,241 of those messages to GitHub.
Your Shared Claude Chats Were Being Quietly Published on Google - Decrypt
https://decrypt.co/374412/anthropic-share-button-quietly-publishing-claude-chats-google
9 Comments
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 26 pts · 23d
Remember folks: if you want to do AI, the only way to do it safely is with a model running locally. Half of the problem with AI isn't the technology itself, but what the techno-fascist US Big Data monopolies use it for: to exploit you.
artwork@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 23d
There's no safe way to "do 'AI'", including locally which means incomparable power and sorrowful dataset difference, and lack of direct source referencing you might at least try prompting/querying a vendor LLM for.
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 7 pts · 23d
What I meant is that you can use AI for what it's good for by querying a model running on a AI-capable machine that isn't connected to the internet. I didn't say what the AI says is trustworthy: the onus is on you to take whatever it spews out with a gigantic salt crystal.
But AI is good at some stuff, and for the few things I use it for, I don't need to share my queries with fucking Google or OpenAI.
hneerqe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 22d
And delete accountability.
Davel23@fedia.io · 14 pts · 23d
My shared Claude chats were not being quietly published on Google. I have no Claude chats, shared or otherwise.
nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 23d
One of my biggest clickbait pet peeves are titles that use that accusatory second person.
owl@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 23d
Didn't that exact thing happen with open ai last year?
rainwall@piefed.social · 5 pts · 23d
Yes, from the article:
artwork@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 23d