Overall AGM plan here
Members are invited to stand on points of order should they believe something went wrong during phase 2. The speaker shall propose a resolution that members can vote on. This phase shall end 48 hours after time of opening. (2026-08-20 01:00 UTC)

79 Comments
jdr@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 19d
During phase two something went wrong with my neck and now it still hurts. I propose that it stop hurting and furthermore I regain the ability to look over my left shoulder.
yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 19d
YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
ACK YEA
mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d
YEA for "stop hurting" proposal
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d
ACK YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d
ACK YEA
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
nay
jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
oh shit, it's 5-0
jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d
I've never even seen twin peaks
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
lucky
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d
ACK NAY
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
YEAS 3
NAYS 1
ADOPTED
jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d
FUCC YEA
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 19d
I want lemmy renamed to lynyrd. it's a better name.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
YEAS 1
NAYS 0
ADOPTED
jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d
This is my favourite sublynny
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
:3
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
this is big! https://lynyrd.sdf.org/c/funhole
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
No,
This is big
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
nice
cathfish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 19d
YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
Oh sorry I forgot:
ACK YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d
As cool as "lynyrd" sounds, I fear it is not in the powers of FUCC to change it
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 18d
even if we go all grassroots? go door to door, getting signatures. getting elected to the lemmy board, then bribing all the opponents, and finally changing the name to lynyrd.
it can be done.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d
Now that motions have been tabled and voted on, it has come to my attention that some motions received perhaps one or two votes. It was the assumption of the speaker that a given motion would be implicitly voted YEA by the member tabling, however I did not make that clear. Furthermore, I did not make clear that in the result of a tie, the status quo would remain (motion defeated).
My friends in content, do you accept that motions tabled as part of phase 2 should be assumed to have an implicit YEA vote cast by their tabler? (YEA/NAY IMPLICIT)
My friends in content, do you accept that in the event of a tie, the status quo shall dominate and the motions will be considered as failed? (YEA/NAY TIE)
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d
I think that instead of yae nae, the arrowclicks should be counted
mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 20d
Doesn't the number of arrowclicks depend on one's relative position in this fediverse?
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d
how do you mean?
jdr@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 19d
There is no privileged frame of reference, whether the arrows point up or down, or are red or blue depends on your relative velocity and orientation.
mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 20d
The number you see may be different for two accounts on two different servers, right?
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 19d
Is that how it works? Japanese Jesus, this protocol is cursed.
mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d
Cursed or just natural consequence of federation? Probably both.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d
The speaker finds this out-of-order as the procedure for voting has already been agreed upon.
jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d
The whole goddamn system is out of order
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
no u
jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d
I can't handle the truth :(
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sA0glbG6c-8
yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 19d
NAY IMPLICIT NAY TIE
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
ACK NAY IMPLICIT
ACK NAY TIE
jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d
I think that the default should be to change something in the event of a tie. This status quo business is what the British parliament does, and I'm worried we might end up like them.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d
ACK NAY TIE
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d
Putting my money where my mouth is
YEA IMPLICIT
YEA TIE
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d
ACK YEA IMPLICIT
ACK YEA TIE
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
IMPLICIT:
YEAS 1
NAYS 1
TIE
Since TIE failed does this mean the YEAS have it?
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 14d
I rule that this passes
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
TIE:
YEAS 1
NAYS 2
REJECTED
oh no
jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d
Oh yea!
Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 4 pts · 19d
I am watching the old anime called "Captain Future" and came to the conclusion that it would be greatly improved with some hentai.
jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d
YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 14d
ACK YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d
The speaker makes no comment about the potential for improvement, though it is not believed to be something that FUCC has the power to influence
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d
YEAS 2
NAYS 0
ADOPTED
Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 14d
Okay! Free puppy's for everyone!
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
Nice!
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 18d
I forgot that January 4th should be celebrated as the world moderator appreciation day.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d
YEAS 1
NAYS 0
ADOPTED
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d
thank you for letting me spend my veto
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
no u
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
ok?
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
it really is
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
ilu
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
I am not seeing any votes on this, and the deadline has passed. Perhaps AGM 2027
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
are you kidding me?!?!?!
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
Well... Given that my procedure in case of tie proposal was rejected, and the implicit vote proposal was tied... it is possible this will pass should I interpret these outcomes as ties change status quo thus implicits are accounted for.
jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d
I'm very pleased by this outcome
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
I bet you are!
$5
jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d
I'll take that bet!
Do you change for a twenty?
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
Sure
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d
I want to use my veto.
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
I don't recall any motions passing saying you have veto!
pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
i have 2 from last year
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d
aw yeh?
qrstuv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 20d
Thank you for creating content!
mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d
YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d
ACK YEA
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d
What's your point?
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 17d
YEAS 2
NAYS 0
ADOPTED