FUCC AGM 2026 - Phase 3: Points of Order

Overall AGM plan here

Members are invited to stand on points of order should they believe something went wrong during phase 2. The speaker shall propose a resolution that members can vote on. This phase shall end 48 hours after time of opening. (2026-08-20 01:00 UTC)

16 points · 79 comments · view on lemmy.world

79 Comments

jdr@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 19d (14 replies)

During phase two something went wrong with my neck and now it still hurts. I propose that it stop hurting and furthermore I regain the ability to look over my left shoulder.

yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d

ACK YEA

mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA for "stop hurting" proposal

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d

ACK YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d

ACK YEA

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d (5 replies)

nay

jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d (3 replies)

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d (2 replies)

oh shit, it's 5-0

jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d (1 reply)

I've never even seen twin peaks

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d

lucky

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d

ACK NAY

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d (1 reply)

YEAS 3

NAYS 1

ADOPTED

jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d

FUCC YEA

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 19d (10 replies)

I want lemmy renamed to lynyrd. it's a better name.

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d (5 replies)

YEAS 1

NAYS 0

ADOPTED

jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d (1 reply)

This is my favourite sublynny

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d

:3

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (2 replies)
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (1 reply)

No,

This is big

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d

nice

cathfish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d

Oh sorry I forgot:

ACK YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d (1 reply)

As cool as "lynyrd" sounds, I fear it is not in the powers of FUCC to change it

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 18d

even if we go all grassroots? go door to door, getting signatures. getting elected to the lemmy board, then bribing all the opponents, and finally changing the name to lynyrd.

it can be done.

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d (21 replies)

Now that motions have been tabled and voted on, it has come to my attention that some motions received perhaps one or two votes. It was the assumption of the speaker that a given motion would be implicitly voted YEA by the member tabling, however I did not make that clear. Furthermore, I did not make clear that in the result of a tie, the status quo would remain (motion defeated).

My friends in content, do you accept that motions tabled as part of phase 2 should be assumed to have an implicit YEA vote cast by their tabler? (YEA/NAY IMPLICIT)

My friends in content, do you accept that in the event of a tie, the status quo shall dominate and the motions will be considered as failed? (YEA/NAY TIE)

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d (10 replies)

I think that instead of yae nae, the arrowclicks should be counted

mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 20d (5 replies)

Doesn't the number of arrowclicks depend on one's relative position in this fediverse?

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d (4 replies)

how do you mean?

jdr@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 19d

There is no privileged frame of reference, whether the arrows point up or down, or are red or blue depends on your relative velocity and orientation.

mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 20d (2 replies)

The number you see may be different for two accounts on two different servers, right?

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 19d (1 reply)

Is that how it works? Japanese Jesus, this protocol is cursed.

mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d

Cursed or just natural consequence of federation? Probably both.

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d (3 replies)

The speaker finds this out-of-order as the procedure for voting has already been agreed upon.

jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d (2 replies)

The whole goddamn system is out of order

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (1 reply)

no u

jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d

I can't handle the truth :(

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sA0glbG6c-8

yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 19d (1 reply)

NAY IMPLICIT NAY TIE

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d

ACK NAY IMPLICIT

ACK NAY TIE

jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d (1 reply)

I think that the default should be to change something in the event of a tie. This status quo business is what the British parliament does, and I'm worried we might end up like them.

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 19d

ACK NAY TIE

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d (1 reply)

Putting my money where my mouth is

YEA IMPLICIT

YEA TIE

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d

ACK YEA IMPLICIT

ACK YEA TIE

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (1 reply)

IMPLICIT:

YEAS 1

NAYS 1

TIE

Since TIE failed does this mean the YEAS have it?

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 14d

I rule that this passes

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (1 reply)

TIE:

YEAS 1

NAYS 2

REJECTED

oh no

jdr@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 17d

Oh yea!

Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 4 pts · 19d (6 replies)

I am watching the old anime called "Captain Future" and came to the conclusion that it would be greatly improved with some hentai.

jdr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 14d

ACK YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 19d

The speaker makes no comment about the potential for improvement, though it is not believed to be something that FUCC has the power to influence

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d (2 replies)

YEAS 2

NAYS 0

ADOPTED

Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 14d (1 reply)

Okay! Free puppy's for everyone!

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d

Nice!

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 18d (18 replies)
pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d (5 replies)

YEAS 1

NAYS 0

ADOPTED

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 14d (4 replies)

thank you for letting me spend my veto

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d (3 replies)

no u

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d (2 replies)

ok?

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d (1 reply)

it really is

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d

ilu

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (11 replies)

I am not seeing any votes on this, and the deadline has passed. Perhaps AGM 2027

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (10 replies)

are you kidding me?!?!?!

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (9 replies)

Well... Given that my procedure in case of tie proposal was rejected, and the implicit vote proposal was tied... it is possible this will pass should I interpret these outcomes as ties change status quo thus implicits are accounted for.

jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d (3 replies)

I'm very pleased by this outcome

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (2 replies)

I bet you are!

$5

jdr@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 17d (1 reply)

I'll take that bet!

Do you change for a twenty?

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d

Sure

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 17d (4 replies)

I want to use my veto.

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (3 replies)

I don't recall any motions passing saying you have veto!

pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d (2 replies)

i have 2 from last year

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 17d

aw yeh?

qrstuv@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 20d (4 replies)

Thank you for creating content!

mcz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 19d (1 reply)

YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 19d

ACK YEA

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 20d

What's your point?

pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 17d

YEAS 2

NAYS 0

ADOPTED