The second definition is telling you that verboten means something is "forbidden, prohibited". As in, the "something" is forbidden because it is prohibited.
But that first one? "Forbidden; prohibited".
That's where the real first use definition would go...except you are forbidden from knowing what it should be defined as...because it's prohibited. For you.
Simply don't, next time, ok? Or you'll be verboten next.
11 Comments
AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com · 6 pts · 11d
I respect DuckDuckGo as a secure less data-hungry-tracking-search option... But it's almost hilariously bad at times.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 10d
https://noai.duckduckgo.com/
Not like this changes however much/little data they might collect, but it sure cuts out a great deal of the slop..
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 11d
Forbidden, prohibited
Aqivex@fedinsfw.app · 3 pts · 11d
You think it's an error, but no.
The second definition is telling you that verboten means something is "forbidden, prohibited". As in, the "something" is forbidden because it is prohibited.
But that first one? "Forbidden; prohibited".
That's where the real first use definition would go...except you are forbidden from knowing what it should be defined as...because it's prohibited. For you.
Simply don't, next time, ok? Or you'll be verboten next.
jaemo@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 10d
verständlich.
neclimdul@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 10d
I'll be what next?
jlow@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 11d
Ew, turn off the slop features.
Zwiebel@feddit.org · 2 pts · 11d
This is cultural appropriation, I'm gonna sue america
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 1 pts · 11d
Forbidden; prohibited.
Forbidden, prohibited.
s@piefed.world · 2 pts · 11d
The second one actually has a comma instead of a semicolon
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 1 pts · 10d
Oops