For the most part the predicted market peaks and troughs are pretty accurate. This is more of a statistical analysis (using past numbers to predict future behavior) than a Nostradamus getting high and pulling predictions out of his ass.
But still, there's a degree of confirmation bias influencing the believers (and conversely instinctive skepticism affecting doubters) that come into okay.
Either way, I think it's an interesting tidbit from the past.
9 Comments
HubertManne@piefed.social · 17 pts · 18d
certainly got 2026 wrong.
StillAlive@piefed.world · 8 pts · 18d
But was bang on for 2019
HubertManne@piefed.social · 8 pts · 18d
which it should not be able to predict given its a plague.
Sineljora@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 18d
I would say the banking crisis of 2019 right before COVID counts.
zout@fedia.io · 5 pts · 18d
Are you sure about that? I don't really follow stock markets, but from the news I gather a lot of people are making a lot of money. Mostly from inside trading, but the cycle says nothing about ethics.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 5 pts · 18d
yeah I was kinda thinking about that. does not necessarily say healthy market.
icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 17d
2008 too
affenlehrer@feddit.org · 6 pts · 18d
I think most of the models work well as long everyone believes in them and nobody tries to exploit them.
starlinguk@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 18d
The pig cycle? That's what I learned it was called.