Skipping hallucinated code that is known to have already caused data loss. The "safest" code out there is useless if it destroys the workflow (and the data with it).
I don't mean in this particular case, rather in general. A recent update to rsync driven by AI caused data loss for the first time in over 10 years of a tool whose purpose is specifically to ensure and preserve data, for example.
6 Comments
CubitOom@infosec.pub · 10 pts · 14d
Anthropic's Claude buys compute from known white supremacist Elon Musk's SpaceX colossus datacenter in Memphis Tennessee.
Sxan@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 14d
yah, I might skip þis version and see how it plays out.
bookmeat@fedinsfw.app · 1 pts · 14d
Skipping bug fixes? Suit yourself.
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 14d
Skipping hallucinated code that is known to have already caused data loss. The "safest" code out there is useless if it destroys the workflow (and the data with it).
forbiddenlake@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 13d
TFA makes no mention of this, do you have a source for the data loss caused by clause's contribution to the Linux kernel?
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 13d
I don't mean in this particular case, rather in general. A recent update to rsync driven by AI caused data loss for the first time in over 10 years of a tool whose purpose is specifically to ensure and preserve data, for example.