There was an interview with Emma Watson around the live action movie release where she commented along those lines. Something to the effect of, "It's sad in a way when he becomes human. I was just thinking, 'You were quite nice before, actually', you know?"
It also adds some new flavor to the reason why when Gaston picked up one of her books and he started twisting it around left and right to try to make sense of it.
I can only imagine what was going through his mind.
It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)
Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.
I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can't consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?
Oh what's that? Because you personally find it disgusting? How'd I know you were gonna say that?
Well I've got news for you about your personal opinions and the ethics of insisting that other people conform to them.
A lot of kink is disgusting to most people. That doesn't make it unethical. If someone likes getting peed on, or tasered, or verbally degraded because of their race (all things I've met people who are turned on by!), and they have a way to communicate to the person doing those things to them that they're not having fun anymore and want it to stop, and that person actually does stop, and does so immediately, there's no harm done.
No furry, no matter how depraved (and fewer furries than you'd think are horny for animal characters at all, much less quadrupedal ones), will ever actually fuck a dog, because real animals cannot consent and we know that. Furries who do actually fuck dogs get disavowed by the entire rest of the fandom almost immediately (see Hypnotist Sappho). This scenario is therefore entirely hypothetical, and if it's still morally wrong to you and you don't have an answer as to why, I think you have some work to do regarding prejudice.
40 Comments
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 75 pts · 17d
I'd be rather disappointed when he turned human, I imagine. Not what I was signing up for at all.
danekrae@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 17d
"Who TF is this guy?!"
MycelialMass@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 17d
I think the makers of Shrek learned that lesson
tanisnikana@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 17d
Yeah, I remember watching that and was thinking, “now this guy’s just some schlub with no redeeming characteristics, change him back dammit.”
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 26 pts · 17d
There was an interview with Emma Watson around the live action movie release where she commented along those lines. Something to the effect of, "It's sad in a way when he becomes human. I was just thinking, 'You were quite nice before, actually', you know?"
bus_factor@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 17d
Made no difference, she was in it for the library anyway.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 5 pts · 16d
dragging his ass back to the witch that cursed him
excuse me ma'am could we get the same one again please
waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 17d
itrealgood@mander.xyz · 72 pts · 17d
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 16d
I have borne witness to such double page degeneracy! It was a picture!
It pleased me greatly.
rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social · 5 pts · 17d
Looking at the centre fold there.
Turning it around trying to figure out what's what.
bizarroland@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 17d
It also adds some new flavor to the reason why when Gaston picked up one of her books and he started twisting it around left and right to try to make sense of it.
I can only imagine what was going through his mind.
cannedtuna@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 17d
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 17d
Centrefold?
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 16d
(Un?)fortunately for him, it was a corrupted coloring book. Maybe it awakened something within him?
OozingPositron@feddit.cl · 1 pts · 16d
lmao
huquad@lemmy.ml · 19 pts · 17d
Same thing, but Mulan and Shen
hexdream@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 17d
Red rocket 🚀
Agent641@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 16d
🪢
minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 17d
Women and bestiality, an uncomfortable conversation.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 17d
It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)
testauser1@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 17d
Yep. Scooby and Velma totally kosher for the same reason
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 17d
Theoretically, sure, but that’s pretty fucked up to do to shaggy
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 16d
Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 16d
It’s shaggy and scooby…
Velma and Daphne are together, but that’s an open relationship, so it’s not a problem for Daphne.
hexdream@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 16d
Put down the peanut butter, and step away from the dog...
TipRing@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 17d
Teratophilia actually.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · -10 pts · 17d
Its anthropomorphic fetishizing of animals. That they would still fuck a dog as long at its human enough, is revolting.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 5 pts · 16d
If it can consent, what's the problem?
minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 16d
The bestiality part.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 1 pts · 15d
I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can't consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?
And you better not say "because it's disgusting"
minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 15d
Eek.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 1 pts · 14d
Oh what's that? Because you personally find it disgusting? How'd I know you were gonna say that?
Well I've got news for you about your personal opinions and the ethics of insisting that other people conform to them.
A lot of kink is disgusting to most people. That doesn't make it unethical. If someone likes getting peed on, or tasered, or verbally degraded because of their race (all things I've met people who are turned on by!), and they have a way to communicate to the person doing those things to them that they're not having fun anymore and want it to stop, and that person actually does stop, and does so immediately, there's no harm done.
No furry, no matter how depraved (and fewer furries than you'd think are horny for animal characters at all, much less quadrupedal ones), will ever actually fuck a dog, because real animals cannot consent and we know that. Furries who do actually fuck dogs get disavowed by the entire rest of the fandom almost immediately (see Hypnotist Sappho). This scenario is therefore entirely hypothetical, and if it's still morally wrong to you and you don't have an answer as to why, I think you have some work to do regarding prejudice.
CybranM@feddit.nu · 8 pts · 17d
I doubt its just one gender that wants to bang non-humans
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 17d
https://youtube.com/watch?v=y2QKDfAiTq4
BambiDiego@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 16d
I don't need to click the link, I know exactly what this is, and I fully approve.
zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 16d
Gentle reminder that not everything is about sex. It's totally fine to fall in love with someone or even be married to them workout having sex.
OozingPositron@feddit.cl · 4 pts · 16d
Hell yeah, I'm married to the workout. 💪💪🏋️
Psythik@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 16d
Nah that's just what the asexuals want you to believe
zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 13d